Home >> Our Work >> Energy lending in south-eastern Europe

Energy lending in south-eastern Europe

South-eastern Europe is riddled with poor planning and corruption in the energy sector and its governments are proving slow to react to the challenges and opportunities offered by the decarbonisation agenda.


Above: planned coal power plants in south-eastern Europe

This should be an opportunity for international lenders like the EBRD, the EIB and the World Bank to promote energy efficiency and sustainable renewables to shift the region's energy sectors towards lower carbon emissions.

So far, however, it is only happening in a few positive exceptions as our study and the projects that we monitor show.

Infographic
The damaging Projects of Energy Community Interest (click to see full size)

Note: This infographic is out of date. It contains projects that were not accepted as priority projects. For comparison, see the final list of approved PECIs.

The European Energy Community


The European Energy Community was established between the EU and a number of third countries in order to extend the EU internal energy market to south-eastern Europe and beyond. (Members include the EU, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Moldova, Kosovo, plus Ukraine.)

The Community's priority projects, however, are set to include several environmentally damaging coal and hydropower projects that will be fast-tracked for financing over the next years.

Read more:
Dirty power plants in Europe's Neighbourhood set to become EU priority
Press release | October 22, 2013

Western Balkans and Ukraine: EC-backed Energy Community to prioritise coal plants that threaten EU long-term climate targets (pdf)
Briefing | October 22, 2013

 

 

Related news


Bankwatch in the media | July 25, 2016

Iz Ministarstva ekonomije su kazali da je studija Deloita uzela u obzir i najnepovoljnije varijante, odgovarajući na tvrdnje nevladinog sektora da je drugi blok Termoelektrane neisplativ.

„Sve varijante pokazuju da je projekat isplativ“, navodi se u reagovanju Ministarstva ekonomije.

Predstavnici civilnog sektora su jutros poručili da bi troškovi proizvodnje u Rudniku uglja morali da budu smanjeni, kako bi projekat gradnje drugog bloka Termoelektrane (TE) Pljevlja imao šansu da bude isplativ.

Energy & climate
Bankwatch in the media | July 25, 2016

Da bi Pljevlja II imala šansu da bude isplativa, NVO navode da bi troškovi proizvodnje u Rudniku uglja Pljevlja bi morali biti smanjeni od 24,21 eura/tona u 2015. godini na 17,5 eura/tona oko 2027.

Dokument koji je Vlada Crne Gore objavila u ime “dokazivanja” isplativosti projekta Pljevlja II zapravo pokazuje suprotno, prema komentarima nevladinih organizacija CEE Bankwatch Network, MANS i Green Home, koji su objavljeni danas i dostavljeni Evropskoj komisiji i drugim relevantnim adresama.

Energy & climate
Bankwatch in the media | July 25, 2016

Oni su dodali da će druga faza tokom izgradnje značajno povećati zaposlenost

Deloitte je, u okviru Studije izvodljivosti uzeo u obzir i prezentovao moguće scenarije izgradnje drugog bloka Termoelektrane (TE) Pljevlja, uključujući i konzervativniji pristup i najnepovoljnije varijante, saopšteno je iz Ministarstva ekonomije.

„Sve tri varijante pokazuju da je projekat isplativ“, navodi se u reagovanju Ministarstva na saopštenje predstavnika CEE Bankwatch Network, Mreže za afirmaciju nevladinog sektora (MANS) i Green Home-a.

Energy & climate
Blog entry | July 22, 2016

For more than 50 years, the lignite mines in Serbia's Kolubara basin have been expanding, effectively engulfing the few small communities living between them. For local residents, whose homes have quite literally been teetering on the brink of the mines, life has become unbearable. But a recent court ruling might be paving the way to a long overdue reprieve for residents who have been promised to be relocated.

EBRD
Energy & climate
Social & economic impacts
Mining
Balkans
Bankwatch in the media | July 21, 2016

To have a new block of the thermal power plant Kostolac B constructed and Drmno opencast extended, Serbian Government borrowed $608.2 from the Chinese state bank, and committed to obey Chinese laws. A Chinese company is the main contractor for the works. Serbia failed to consult Romania, even though it was a must, while Serbian Administrative court passed a ruling that Serbian Ministry of agriculture and environmental protection had violated law with its approval of the Environmental impact assessment study.

Energy & climate