Bankwatch

Home > Publication search results

Publication search results

Letter: European Commission should make use of its shareholder role in the EBRD

Advocacy letter | 28 February, 2012 | Download PDF

A look at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development’s investments in the Ombla hydropower plant in Croatia and the Boskov Most plant in Macedonia reveals that the EU does not make full use of its shareholder role in the Bank and allows approval of the projects that contravene EU principles and standards. Read more on our blog:


Enquiry regarding the Natura 2000 assessment process of the Ombla hydropower plant

Advocacy letter | 27 February, 2012 | Download PDF

More information on the Ombla hydropower plant project is available on our website. The EBRD replied to our enquiry on March 1, 2012. Their answer can be downloaded as pdf.


High risk of corruption in Sostanj TES 6: Report by Slovenian Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (unofficial translation)

Official document | 23 February, 2012 | Download PDF

For many years TES 6 has been surrounded by rumours of corruption. In February 2012 the Slovene State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption published a report stating that acts of corruption could have influenced the awarding of the contract to French company ALSTOM and that the law on the state guarantee itself was initially drafted by employees of HSE, the owner of the Sostanj power complex. Slovene NGO Focus Association for Sustainable Development has translated the report to English. (The original report (in Slovenian language) is available for download here (pdf).)


Comments on Romania’s application for transitional allocation of free emission allowances

Study | 22 February, 2012 | Download PDF

Last year, the Romanian government applied for allocation of approximately 75 million tonnes of emissions allowances free of charge in the period 2013-2019. In return, our government proposed a national investment plan that includes 22 (out of 24) fossil fuel installations and would result in 36 percent of the proposed new capacity coming from coal.


Energy Security For Whom? For What?

Study | 16 February, 2012 | Download PDF

How can fossil fuels and uranium be kept in the ground and agrofuels off the land in ways that do not inflict suffering upon millions? Mainstream policy responses to these issues are largely framed in terms of “energy security”. Yet far from making energy supplies more secure, such policies are triggering a cascade of new insecurities for millions of people.


By clicking accept, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

We use cookies to: - Better understand and store user’s preferences for future visits. - Gather statistical data about site traffic and user behaviour and interactions in order to offer better site experiences and tools in the future. We may also use trusted third-party services that track this information on our behalf. You can enable your device to notify you each time a cookie is being sent by changing your browser settings. If you turn cookies off, It won’t affect the user’s experience .

Close