• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
Home > Blog entry > Slovakia’s climate duplicity

Slovakia’s climate duplicity

At home, Slovakia pays lip service to the climate issues, but abroad – it does not even bother pretending. As it continues to finance crude oil facilities in Cuba, its real climate ambitions are laid bare.

Dana Marekova, Slovakia  |  15 August 2019


Most Slovaks would be surprised to find out their public funds finance a fossil fuels industry in Cuba. The national export-credit agency (ECA) Eximbanka SR channels as much as 60 per cent of its entire financing into the island country, notably into the two oil power plants: Mariel and Felton. Both are rife with serious environmental and human rights problems.

The environmental and social study revealed that the projected emissions of sulphur dioxide on the  the “modernised” sixth block of the Felton power plant will be 40 times of what is permitted in the EU, and 50 times of what is recommended by the World Health Organisation. The levels of small dust particles, which are particularly harmful for health, are also expected to go above the levels permitted in Europe. 

The human rights situation of local inhabitants also leaves much to be desired – any disagreement  with the officially supported project (or simply an attempt to find out about health impacts), can be dangerous. Transparency or environmental consultations with affected communities are practically non-existent. 

On top of it all, these foreign investments make little economic sense. In an economically volatile country such as Cuba, the risks of default are too high. Eximbanka SR itself admits that the risk is “quite significant”. 

In the face of the climate emergency, we cannot afford burning fossil fuels – not at home, not abroad.  In the interconnected world where pollution and climate change know no border, this two-tongued approach to the environment is not just morally wrong, but also ineffective.

 

More on this (in Slovak): 

  • https://dennikn.sk/1512005/co-sa-stane-ak-nam-kuba-buduci-rok-prestane-platit/
  • https://dennikn.sk/1383341/za-postojom-k-venezuele-moze-byt-aj-biznis-v-bratislave-o-nom-rokoval-vplyvny-politik-z-kuby/?utm_source=follow_authors&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mnt-email.author.article.new-15.02.2019-21&utm_content=24332
  • http://www.teraz.sk/slovensko/clovek-v-ohrozeni-slovenska-pomoc-na/251073-clanok.html?mostViewedArticlesInSectionTab=0

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground – straight to your inbox.





Location: Slovakia

Project: Export Credit Agencies (ECAs)

Tags: export | fossil fuels | human rights

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube