• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
Home > Bankwatch in the media > Bankwatch in Mongolia?

Bankwatch in Mongolia?

12 March 2013, Mad Mongolia

Despite the refusal by the Mongolian government on supporting Oyu Tolgoi Phase-II project finance process, World Bank’s “legally separate” IFC board has approved the loan of USD200-300 million. It proved that Rio Tinto is more convincing than the Mongolian government on how would the future events will unfold.

As a member and shareholder of IFC, Mongolia holds around 0.34% of its’ shares. Therefore, there is no way we have an exclusive board member. As end of 2012 IFC’s investment portfolio in Mongolia was around USD150 million. According to the current plan a single project, Oyu Tolgoi, will add another USD300 million. As an international financial institution it perceives a single mine development is going to contribute to the development and reduce the poverty that much.

In October, 2011 BankWatch had released a report titled ‘Spirited away – Mongolia’s mining boom and the poeple that development left behind’. It mentioned that mines that use large amount of water are advancing rapidly despite having not done sufficient scientific studies on water resources in the Gobi region. Especially regarding the usage of deep saline aquifers. In China, deep aquifers are prohibited to be used in industrial purposes. The effect on using the Gobi deep aquifers is not clear today.

Recently, BankWatch has written a letter to EBRD questioning its’ role in Oyu Tolgoi’s development. It mentioned that ESIA’s scope was limited, violated EBRD Performance Requirements, and asked EBRD to take measures on transparency of the company’s reporting of ESIA.

It is very unusual that the IFC and other development banks and financial institutions are willing to lend to mines that the social and environmental impact assessment (ESIA) is not satisfactory for the government and other international non-governmental organizations. Perhaps Mongolia needs its’ own Watch for the development agencies and organizations.

Institution: EBRD

Theme: Energy & climate

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube