• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos

Home > Publications > Public development banks failing 2 degree test, heavy fossil fuel financing persists

Public development banks failing 2 degree test, heavy fossil fuel financing persists

Public development banks failing 2 degree test, heavy fossil fuel financing persists

Bankwatch Mail    |    17 December 2015

Download


The MDB Climate Change Scorecard, published by Bank Information Center and Sierra Club during COP21, highlights how none of the world’s biggest multi-lateral development banks is on track to help keep the world below 2 degrees warming, and reveals how the seven banks in question – including the World Bank, the EIB and the EBRD – are continuing to support fossil fuel projects in developing countries.

Share this



This article is from Issue 63 of our quarterly newsletter Bankwatch Mail

Download as pdf

Go to overview page

Browse all articles on the right

 
 

Subscribe for email delivery

The scorecard assessed the recent record of the MDBs in meeting their stated commitments to help poor countries transition to a low-carbon economy, to avoid or reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions and to increase support to renewable forms of energy.

The IFC, the World Bank’s private lending arm, and the EIB were identified by the scorecard as the ‘most enthusiastic’ fossil fuel promoters – taking account of both banks’ direct and indirect lending – while the Asian Development Bank was identified as the biggest funder of coal. Bank Information Center’s Nezir Sinani pointed out, “These banks fail the climate test because they are neither measuring nor trying to curtail their support for fossil fuels. This support often remains hidden behind incentives, guarantees or in complex investment structures like public private partnerships or lending through third parties. This is an unacceptable use of public funds, which should be promoting a greener, cleaner world.”

Find out more

Download the MDB Climate Change Scorecard (pdf)

Back to Bankwatch Mail 63

Download
Institution: EBRD | EIB | World Bank Group | ADB

Theme: Energy & climate

Tags: BW Mail 63 | climate action | fossil fuels

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground. We believe that the billions of public money should work for people and the environment.

More about our work

More about us

STAY INFORMED





Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube