• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos

Home > Bankwatch in the media > Distress signal

Distress signal

11 March 2014, Kiyv Post

Ukraine’s new leaders deserve praise for some of the moves they have made since coming to power after Viktor Yanukovych abandoned the presidency on Feb. 22. But they will need lots of outside help in managing the multiple political, economic and military crises confronting Ukraine.

Politically and economically, the Oleksandr Turchynov-Arseniy Yatseniuk team has taken the right moves by agreeing to whatever conditions that the United States, European Union and International Monetary Fund require for a multibillion-dollar bailout. Given the long and deep history of corruption among Ukraine’s elites, any Western aid would be foolish and wasted without stringent outside oversight and without designing new, sustainable mechanisms to prevent and fight corruption.

“It is very important that the world and especially the European Union stand by Ukraine right now,” comments Bankwatch’s executive director Mark Fodor. “Yet the financial package proposed by the EU relies too heavily on loans via institutions whose track record in both Ukraine and Russia has done more to benefit the domestic elites and foreign corporations than the general population. This sounds like just administering more of a medicine that has proven to suffocate the patient in the past.

Militarily, Ukraine finally has the opportunity to gain the West’s help in improving its capability.

However, in other areas, Ukraine’s power structure hasn’t changed much. Turning to Ukraine’s oligarchs to save Ukraine from Russian dismemberment may be a brilliant short-term move, but it’s not much of an exaggeration to liken it to turning to thieves for protection from murderers. Putin even identified the problem when he called Igor Kolomoisky “a crook” and Ukraine’s corruption stratospheric.

The Soviet and post-Soviet systems of corruption and governance need to be dislodged completely.
Ukraine’s leaders need to request outside help to fix the nation’s police and courts system. They need the West’s help in tracking down the dozens of former top officials, led by Yanukovych, and bringing them to justice. They need the West’s help in investigating violent and financial crimes, since Ukraine’s authorities have proven since 1991 they have no institutions or political will to do so.

Institution: EBRD

Theme: Social & economic impacts

Location: Ukraine

Tags: Ukraine

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube