Home >> Our Work >> Projects >> Kostolac lignite power plant, Serbia

Kostolac lignite power plant, Serbia


The Kostolac mine.

On January 19th 2015, the Serbian parliament voted on the ratification of a USD 608 million loan agreement from the China ExIm Bank for its construction. Previously in November 2013, the Serbian Government had signed an agreement with China Machinery Engineering Corporation (CMEC), which would implement the project.

There are already existing units Kostolac A1, A2, B1 and B2 and Drmno and Cirikovac open cast mines at the site.

Serbia relies on lignite for around 70 percent of its electricity production, which poses challenges for the country in switching to a low-carbon economy in line with EU policy. It also poses problems in terms of climate change resilience, as the floods in 2014 have shown (see below).

Successful court challenge sent improper Environmental Impact Assessment back to the drawing board

The first environmental impact assessment for Kostolac B3 was approved in December 2013. It lacked any analysis of transboundary impacts, even though the site is just 15 km from the Romanian border, and suffered from numerous other deficiencies. It was therefore challenged in court by the Serbian Center for Ecology and Sustainable Development – CEKOR.

In June 2016 the court ruled that CEKOR’s arguments were valid and that the decision should be revoked. By this time, however, the decision had already expired and the environmental assessment has had to be started again.

Risks from flooding


During the tragic floods that hit the Balkans in 2014 the Kostolac B power plant narrowly avoided being flooded thanks to the tireless work of plant workers, firefighters and civilian volunteers. While their efforts were successful that time – unlike at Kolubara and Nikola Tesla, which were seriously affected by the floods – at the end of July 2014 in a separate flooding incident unit A2 at Kostolac was closed for several days and the Drmno mine was partially flooded.

Such vulnerabilities have not been taken into account while planning the new unit.

Read more


When water mixes with coal - The impacts of the floods in Serbia on people living next to lignite mines
Blog post | May 30, 2014

EBRD in Serbia: Don't use floods to prop up coal
Press release | July 7, 2014

Espoo Convention breached by Serbia in the Kostolac B3 Environmental Impact Assessment in a transboundary context

The Kostolac site is just around 15km from the Romanian border and even nearer to the River Danube, yet Serbia had not notified potentially affected Parties, i.e. Romania about the plans for the new plant and mine.

At its 33rd meeting held in March 2015, the Espoo Convention Implementation Committee noted that the construction of one block at the Kostolac lignite power plant was an activity listed in Appendix I to the Convention and that the likelihood of a significant adverse transboundary impact could not be excluded.

On those grounds, the Committee decided to begin a Committee initiative under paragraph 6 of the Committee’s structure and functions. The Committee asked Serbia to proceed with the notification under article 3, paragraph 1, as soon as possible.

In his letter, the Chair also urged Serbia to comply with its obligations under the Convention. This is the first time that the Committee has opened an initiative related to cross-border impacts of a coal fired power plant, thus opening an interesting precedent for the numerous coal plants being planned across the Balkans which often cut corners in legislative implementation.

The case was closed at the Committee’s 36th meeting (pdf) in September 2016, after the Serbian Ministry of Environment had indeed sent a notification to the Romanian Environment Ministry to inform about the reopening of the environmental impact assessment and seek the confirmation from the neighbouring country about the intention to be part of the transboundary impact assessment.

The Romanian Ministry has created a dedicated section on its website regarding this project, but so far no documents have been submitted for consultation.

No environmental assessment required for mine expansion

The Drmno mine only has approval for production of 9 million tonnes of lignite per year and needs to expand to 12 million in order to feed the new plant. However in 2013 the government decided that no environmental impact assessment would be necessary for the mine expansion.

Serbia’s Parliament fast track ratification of the loan – a procedure subject to European institutions’ criticism

The fact that the extraordinary session to ratify the contract between the Serbian and Chinese governments was announced less than twenty-four hours in advance is an outrageous attempt to bypass public debate while making major commitments.

This year's European Parliament resolution on the EC's progress report criticises Serbia's lack of progress with renewable energy, while it also expresses concern that most laws in Serbia are adopted under the fast-track procedure, not always allowing for sufficient stakeholder consultation.

The fact that the extraordinary session to ratify the contract between the Serbian and Chinese governments was announced less than twenty-four hours in advance is an outrageous attempt to bypass public debate while making major commitments.

State aid incompatible with the Energy Community Treaty

State aid risks


Kostolac is only one of several coal infrastructure projects in Energy Community countries that may be breaching state aid regulations.

Find out more

Serbia, as a signatory to the Energy Community Treaty, must follow EU legislation on state aid. This regulates the ways that state resources can be used to support undertakings, in order to avoid distorting competition and cross-border trade.

The Serbian Government has agreed to provide loan guarantees for commercial loans for the Kostolac B3 unit. As well as the financial difficulties in doing this, sovereign or sub-sovereign loan guarantees have to comply with certain conditions, such as not exceeding 80% of the value of the loan and being paid for by the project promoter at market rates. It is not clear whether this is the case with Kostolac.

In addition, on December 29, 2011 a contract was signed between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and Chinese Exim Bank, for USD 293 000 000 – 85% of the cost of the full project Phase 1 - envisaged for reconstruction of blocks B1 and B2 of TE-KO Kostolac, construction of a desulphurization system, building of a landing dock on the Danube and construction of railway infrastructure.

In this contract, the Republic of Serbia is the borrower, responsible for paying back the loan amount, while TE-KO Kostolac, part of the state-owned electricity company Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS) is named as the end-user of the funds.[1] Thus the state takes on all the responsibilities connected with paying back the loan and gives EPS an advantage over potential competitors. This scheme was continued in December 2014 when the Serbian state signed the USD 608 million with China ExIm Bank for the new plant.

Notes

1. The Law on the ratification of the contract is available at: http://www.istinomer.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Prilog-1-Zakon-Garanc...

Share:

Latest developments


 

Blog entry | August 17, 2017

New EU rules entering into force today, to limit pollution from power plants, will also apply in most Western Balkan countries. But the region’s governments are so far acting like they don’t exist.

Blog entry | June 26, 2017

Results of more than half a year of independent air pollution monitoring in the Balkans have been launched today. During a conference at the European Parliament, MEPs, European Commission and Energy Community representatives, NGOs and citizens groups called for urgent action on air pollution in the Western Balkans.

Blog entry | June 26, 2017

In the Western Balkans, air pollution can be a fatal problem, made worse by some of those countries’ energy policies. Ioana Ciuta sheds light on the region’s developing crisis, which is claiming lives at an alarming rate.

Blog entry | June 16, 2017

Almost all the countries in the Balkan region are planning to build new coal power plants, but there has been virtually no mention of the need for them to comply with new pollution standards.

Press release | June 14, 2017

Almost none of the new coal power plants planned in the Western Balkans will meet new, stricter EU pollution standards, according to a new analysis by CEE Bankwatch Network, released today.

Download the analysis as pdf.

Publications

Briefing | June 26, 2017

Bankwatch and our partner organisations have undertaken independent dust monitoring in Balkan countries and we have found worrying levels of particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5), dust so small it enters deep into our lungs and blood streams causing irreversible damage and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

Study | June 14, 2017

The new reference document on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants (LCP BREF) and its implications for new coal.

Briefing | June 1, 2017

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Romania all plan new lignite power plants during the next few years. In contrast, most EU countries are giving up building new coal plants and seven EU states are already coal-free. Since the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank have virtually halted lending for new coal power plants, most of them are due to be financed by Chinese state banks – ExIm Bank and the China Development Bank.

Briefing | March 29, 2017

This briefing analyses ten coal-fired power plant projects across the Western Balkans and finds that, once the cost of carbon emissions allowances are factored in, they could become a serious liability for both the companies involved and the public.

Briefing | November 14, 2016

Coal is the single biggest contributor to global climate change. But governments and investors planning new coal capacities have a range of flimsy arguments why coal would be the best or the only alternative. This briefing busts a number of myths surrounding coal, such as "coal is cheap", "alleviates poverty" or "coal is clean".