Gacko II, Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Republika Srpske government plans to build a new 350 MW lignite power plant in Gacko, near the town’s existing plant. After years of stagnation, in August 2022 it was reported that the Czech company Witkowitz was considering investing in the project.
![gacko lignite power, bosnia and herzegovina](https://bankwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/gacko-lignite-power-bosnia-and-herzegovina.png)
Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
In December 2017, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between state-owned utility Elektroprivreda Republike Srpske, the China Machinery and Engineering Corporation (CMEC) and Emerging Markets Power Fund, to build a new 350 MW lignite power plant in Gacko, near the town’s existing plant. After years of stagnation, in August 2022 it was reported that the Czech company Witkowitz was considering investing in the project. However, it is still unclear where financing would come from.
As is too often the case in southeast Europe, there has been no convincing analysis proving that this plant is needed or that it would be the best way to provide Bosnia-Herzegovina’s energy supply in the coming years.
In April 2018 an analysis by economist Damir Miljević showed that fatal flaws in the input data make it highly likely the plant will generate losses. Three out of the main data inputs for the official feasibility study – the price of coal, electricity sales price, and the price of CO2 – are unrealistic:
- A realistic price of coal is mentioned in the study as just over EUR 18 per tonne – yet the amount used in the calculation is much lower, around EUR 13.3 per tonne.
- The Study foresees export of all the electricity generated, at a price of EUR 50 per MWh, except in exceptional cases when 30% would be sold on the domestic market at EUR 19.90 per MWh. There no evidence that the electricity would find a market in the long term and that it could be sold at this price. Moreover, the scenario including 30% of electricity being sold domestically is not even examined in the calculation – if it was it would show that the plant is unprofitable.
- A CO2 price of EUR 5 per tonne is mentioned in the text, but not included in the feasibility calculation. Including even this very low CO2 price in the calculation would take the plant into the realm of unprofitability.
The analysis concludes that although the official feasibility study for Gacko II claims it would generate profit of around EUR 23 million per year, with more realistic input data, a loss of minimum EUR 1.15 million per year looks more likely.
By now the study is also very much out of date, and the impacts of the EU’s planned Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would need to be taken into account for any electricity planned for export.
A March 2023 study by IEEFA found that Gacko II would become a stranded asset under several scenarios, even with generous assumptions that favour lignite generation, and that financing for the project is uncertain. The study also found that investing in onshore wind and utility-scale solar PV would offer safer and improving returns, quicker construction and cleaner power, as well as better access to financing.
In October 2023, an environmental impact assessment process began for the project.
Latest news
Western Balkans decarbonisation is urgent: but the EU enlargement package is still sending mixed signals
Blog entry | 10 November, 2023The European Commission’s annual reports on the Western Balkan countries’ EU accession progress vary considerably on decarbonisation, sending mixed messages on coal and especially gas. The EU needs to take a more consistent approach if the region is to achieve decarbonisation by 2050 at the latest.
Read moreBosnia and Herzegovina’s draft NECP: The good, the bad and the ugly
Blog entry | 20 July, 2023Bosnia and Herzegovina’s draft NECP finally looks to the future, plans no new fossil fuel power plants and significantly scales back unrealistic hydropower plans. But existing coal plants are to keep operating illegally and the draft is furtive about coal-to-biomass plans.
Read moreNew report – deadly legal breaches by Western Balkan coal plants increased in 2022
Press release | 28 June, 2023In 2022, deadly air pollution from the Western Balkans’ coal power plants increased compared to 2021, according to the fifth edition of Bankwatch’s Comply or Close report, published today (1). Emissions of all three regulated pollutants – sulphur dioxide (SO2), dust and nitrogen oxides (NOx) grew, and for the first time, the region’s overall limit for NOx was breached.
Read moreRelated publications
KOSID comments on draft EBRD strategy for Kosovo
Policy comments | 17 April, 2013 | Download PDFKosovo Civil Society Consortium for Sustainable Development (KOSID) is an umbrella for Civil Society groups in Kosovo that follow projects with the aim of contributing to more sustainable solutions. KOSID consists of think tanks, civic initiatives, public information and outreach organizations, and specific professional institutions and associations; those work together as a group in following the projects. KOSID’s comments on the EBRD’s draft strategy for Kosovo argues against supporting a new lignite-fired power plant near Prishtina.
Letter to EBRD: Kosovo strategy procedural concerns
Advocacy letter | 15 April, 2013 | Download PDFThe EBRD draft strategy for Kosovo is currently under public consultation until April 18. While Bankwatch will also publish comments on the content of the strategy, this letter brings important procedural matters to the EBRD’s attention which, if not improved, will seriously impact the quality of the country strategy.
Open letter to EIB & EBRD: Sostanj must never happen again
Advocacy letter | 20 March, 2013 | Download PDFAfter the EIB and the EBRD disbursed a promised 650 million euros for Slovenian lignite plant TES 6 on March 8, Focus Slovenia, CEE Bankwatch Network and 96 other NGOs sent this letter to the two banks calling on them to never commit to such a misguided loan again. The letter includes a list of reasons why Sostanj was undeserving of public loans and a set of measures that need to be taken by the banks immediately in order to avoid such mistakes from being repeated in the future.