• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos

Home > Publications > Needs and priorities for biodiversity funding: a comparative analysis of Latvia and Estonia

Needs and priorities for biodiversity funding: a comparative analysis of Latvia and Estonia

Needs and priorities for biodiversity funding: a comparative analysis of Latvia and Estonia

Briefing    |    22 February 2024

Download

Biodiversity loss is occurring at an unprecedented rate in human history. In the EU, only 15 per cent of habitats and 27 per cent of species have a good conservation status, while an alarming 81 per cent of habitats are in poor or bad condition. 

This is where EU biodiversity financing plays a crucial role, by funding key activities to protect what we still have and to restore what has been lost. There are now a number of new opportunities to improve the provision and use of EU biodiversity financing, namely the soon-to-be-adopted Nature Restoration Law, as well as the proposal for the next EU budget for the 2027–2034 period. 

This briefing provides an overview of the priorities for national biodiversity needs in Latvia and Estonia. It focuses on three main aspects – the current state of biodiversity in the country, the financing available, and the key areas that need this financing. A comparative analysis is then formed based on these assessments in order to identify best practices. Recommendations at both national and EU levels are provided to make the best use of available financing and ensure it is channelled into the key areas for tackling biodiversity loss.  

Download

Theme: biodiversity, EU funds, biodiversity spending, Latvia, Estonia

Location: Latvia, Estonia

Project: EU funds and biodiversity

Tags: EU funds | Estonia | Latvia | biodiversity | biodiversity spending

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground. We believe that the billions of public money should work for people and the environment.

More about our work

More about us

STAY INFORMED





Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube