• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
Home > Blog entry > Climate neutrality or annihilation?

Climate neutrality or annihilation?

Today’s announcement by Estonia to reach climate neutrality by 2050 rings hollow given the country’s plans to increase shale oil production.

Madis Vasser, Estonian Green Movement  |  3 October 2019


Fridays For Future climate strikers outside the venue (photo by Estonian Academy of Sciences)

On Friday 13 September the newly formed Estonian national climate commission held its first conference together with the Estonian Academy of Sciences and Government Office, with the apocalyptic title “Climate Neutrality – Annihilation or Success?” 

A coalition of 12 NGOs were permitted to use the event to hand the prime minister Jüri Ratas a petition with nearly 2 500 signatures, demanding that Estonia become climate neutral by 2035. However, things did not go according to plan. 

Shortly before the event however, the organisers announced that no petitions would be allowed and anywho who tried to hand over any signatures to the prime minister will be removed from the premises, contrary to what was previously agreed. 

Regardless of the initial setback, the NGOs continued to gather signatures and successfully delivered the petition to the prime minister on 30 September. The petition asks to re-open the outdated, long-term national development plans, some of which are based on studies conducted as far back as 2013, well before the landmark Paris Agreement was in place. 

Estonia produces some of the most per capita CO2 emissions in the EU, which rose more than four per cent in 2018, while the rest of the EU declined by 2.5 per cent, according to Eurostat. While Estonia will meet its 2020 Paris climate targets, it will fall way short of its 2030 goals if it continues business as usual: the government is proposing to extend the life of the fossil fuel shale industry by substituting electricity from shale with large amounts of biomass and instead use shale for oil. 

This would mean upwards of one billion euros of investments in new fossil fuel infrastructure and refineries and allocating free CO2 quotas to subsidise the fossil fuel industry instead of planning a just transition. This is in clear contradiction with international climate policies.

The old developmental documents are now being used as the basis for the new National Energy and Climate Plan that all Member States must submit by the end of the year. Such an approach is leading the country on the road to annihilation, not success.

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground – straight to your inbox.





Institution: EU funds |

Theme: EU budget

Location: Estonia

Tags: EU funds

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube