• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
Home > Blog entry > Have you voted in the 2010 worst EU lobbying awards yet?

Have you voted in the 2010 worst EU lobbying awards yet?

ArcelorMittal, one of the candidates for the worst EU lobby award, is the world’s largest private steel company, producing 10 per cent of the world’s steel. It is also one of Europe’s largest emitters of CO2. Yet the company successfully lobbied the European Commission on behalf of Europe’s biggest polluters to continue getting free greenhouse gas emissions permits until at least 2020.

Pippa Gallop, Research coordinator  |  5 November 2010


worstlobbyeu.png

ArcelorMittal, one of the candidates for the worst EU lobby award, is the world’s largest private steel company, producing 10 per cent of the world’s steel. It is also one of Europe’s largest emitters of CO2. Yet the company successfully lobbied the European Commission on behalf of Europe’s biggest polluters to continue getting free greenhouse gas emissions permits until at least 2020.

So if you haven’t voted in the 2010 worst EU lobbying awards yet, ArcelorMittal is a good bet.

ArcelorMittal has also opposed EU proposals to increase CO2 cuts from 20 to 30 per cent, and tried but failed to challenge the rules governing the Emissions Trading Scheme in the European Court and claim financial damages. All the same, the company has profited nicely from its lobbying efforts. In 2008-2009 it held more than 50 million surplus EU emissions allowances – worth up to EUR 1 billion – which it received free of charge, and all of which it can sell to other companies or use itself until 2012.

Bankwatch has seen up close how the company has gone cap in hand to the EBRD, the IFC and the EIB for multiple public loans – over EUR 1 billion in public loans – for environmental improvements. Yet when it comes to showing the public some results… nul points, as they say in Eurovision. From Kazakhstan to Canada, ArcelorMittal’s facilities keep belching pollution, while environmental investments and improvements keep getting delayed.

If there was ever a company that is better at sweet talking decision-makers than making environmental improvements on the ground, it’s ArcelorMittal. It scoops up just about everything else, so why not help ArcelorMittal clinch this year’s top prize in the worst EU lobbying awards.

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground – straight to your inbox.





Institution: EBRD | EIB

Project: ArcelorMittal Temirtau, Kazakhstan

Tags: ArcelorMittal | EU | accountability | corporations | extractive industries | local benefits | policy | transparency

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube