• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
  • Русский

Home > Blog entry > Hydropower vs. nature in southeast Europe: EBRD complicity in environmental crime?

Hydropower vs. nature in southeast Europe: EBRD complicity in environmental crime?

Why is it that when we advocate for something to the international financial institutions (IFIs) they often manage to give it a peculiar twist of their own?

Ana Colovic Lesoska, Macedonian campaigner  |  31 October 2011


dam.jpg

Why is it that when we advocate for something to the international financial institutions (IFIs) they often manage to give it a peculiar twist of their own?

Such is the case with renewable energy. We wanted sustainable, new renewable energy sources, but what do we get? Big hydro. Yes, the same old so-last-century big hydro that has been destroying nature and livelihoods for decades (pdf).

Regular visitors to our blog will already be familiar with Georgia’s ongoing conversion into an electricity socket for Turkey – with few benefits but serious risks for Georgians and their environment – but now the hydro trend looks set to spread to the Balkans.

On 8th November the EBRD’s Board of Directors is to vote on a terrible twosome comprised of the Boskov Most hydropower plant in Macedonia (pdf) and the Ombla hydropower plant in Croatia.

Both projects threaten protected natural areas: Boskov Most hydropower plant would be built within the Mavrovo National Park right on the area where the very rare Balkan lynx lives, while the Ombla plant would be built in a cave with five species of protected bats and numerous other rare cave-dwelling species like the eccentric-looking Proteus anguinus, sometimes known as the ‘human fish’. Both Mavrovo and the Ombla spring area are due to be Natura 2000 sites when Macedonia and Croatia join the EU, and in both cases the environmental assessment procedures have been seriously flawed.

Every day I see IFIs financing projects I don’t agree with, but even I’m shocked by this. It’s well known that there is a problem with EU accession countries rushing to build destructive infrastructure projects before they become EU members and can be penalised for violating EU environmental legislation, yet here is a European public bank that looks set to finance this very practice.

So my message to the European Commission and the EBRD’s Board of Directors is simply: We’re counting on you. Don’t rush into these projects. Both Croatia and Macedonia have serious potential for new renewables such as solar, wind and sustainable biomass, and for increased energy efficiency, but they are underdeveloped. The EBRD is one of the institutions that is best placed to send a clear message to the Croatian and Macedonian governments to do something about this, but will it do so, or just finance whatever is on the governments’ shopping lists?

Image source: rgbtock.com

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground – straight to your inbox.





Institution: EBRD

Theme: Energy & climate | Other harmful projects

Location: Macedonia | Croatia

Project: Hydropower development in Georgia | Ombla hydropower plant, Croatia

Tags: biodiversity | hydro power

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube