Rovinari unit 7, Romania
CANCELLED: The Romanian Government has been negotiating for several years with the Chinese Government to build a new 600 MW unit at the lignite power plant in Rovinari, Gorj County. The new unit would be built on the site of Units 1 and 2, currently decommissioned. A new up and running plant would pollute the whole region for at least 40 more years, a coal plant’s average lifespan.
Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
In December 2012 Oltenia Energy Complex (state owned company) signed a memorandum of understanding with China Huadian Engineering Co. Ltd for setting up a project company and the construction of a 500 MW lignite-fired unit at Rovinari. The initial information was that the new unit would be built at an estimated cost of one billion euros. Since then, more memorandums of understanding have been signed between the Romanian and the Chinese company or the respective Governments, laying down the steps to create a Romanian-Chinese joint-venture, which would implement the project. The most recent one dates to September 2015, when it was reported that the unit would have an installed capacity of 600 MW and would cost EUR 847 million. The project team has met since them, the latest visit of a Chinese delegation to Rovinari taking place in August 2017.
In January 2013, the general manager of the Oltenia Energy Complex said the new unit will export the electricity to Austria and Turkey. China Huadian conducted a pre-feasibility study in 2014 for the construction of this unit at Rovinari, indicating the need to dismantle some of the existing infrastructure, something that would increase the costs of the project and which the representatives CE Oltenia disagreed with at the time. In addition, China Huadian Engineering Co. requested customs exemptions for equipment imported from China, demanding at the same time a long term power purchase agreement or a guaranteed price for coal, which, under European legislation, may be considered illegal state aid. China Huadian would ensure the full financing of the investment, being the main shareholder of the joint venture IPP (Independent Power Producer) that would be created and CE Oltenia would have a share of under 9%.
If the project went ahead, the new unit would be located next to the town of Rovinari, increasing existing air pollution levels from the other 4 units. The lignite would be supplied from the nearby open-pit mines – Tismana I and II, Rosia, Pinoasa, all owned by the same Oltenia Energy Complex – which would require expansion of production capacity. Extending these mines would mean clearing huge land areas, in most cases accompanied by massive deforestation.
Since 2012, Bankwatch Romania has filed a series of complaints in court, requesting the annulment of illegally issued deforestation permits and mine expansion permits which did not assess impacts on the environment. Almost all the actions have been successful in court. After an infringement procedure was initiated by the European Commission, all expansions were reassessed. However, the new permits fail to evaluate the cumulative impact of the mines, and are therefore again the subject of Bankwatch Romania court action, one of them being currently suspended. To date (May 2018) no environmental impact assessment procedure has been launched.
In short:
The existing power plant:
- Part of Oltenia Energy Complex
- 4 units installed every 330 MW each
- Three functional units: 3, 4 and 6; unit 5 undergoing modernisation
- Location: southwestern Romania, Gorj county
- Year of commissioning: 1972
- Fuel used: lignite
- Environmental integrated permit expired on 31.12.2017
New power plant
- China Huadian + CEOltenia
- 1 unit of 600 MW
- Fuel: lignite (6 million tonnes per year)
- Life expectancy: 40 years
- Significant social and environmental impacts
Latest news
Western Balkans: Civil society groups call on European Commission to strengthen support for just transition
Press release | 4 October, 2024A group of civil society organisations, including CEE Bankwatch Network, are calling on the European Commission and other actors to step up support for a just transition in coal-dependent communities in the Western Balkans.
Read moreWestern Balkans: coal pollution increases due to government failures – new report
Press release | 17 September, 2024In 2023, Western Balkan governments’ dereliction of their law enforcement duties again allowed an increase in sulphur dioxide (SO2) pollution from the region’s antiquated coal power plants, according to the sixth edition of Bankwatch’s Comply or Close report, published today (1). Dust and nitrogen oxides (NOx) pollution from coal plants also continued to exceed legal limits.
Read moreEnvironmental NGOs demand halt to KfW controversial biomass investments in Serbia
Press release | 29 July, 202441 environmental organisations from the Western Balkans, Germany, and across Europe have called on German state-owned development bank KfW to stop financing wood biomass energy in Serbia in order to avoid forest degradation risks and locking Serbia into further dependency on high-carbon energy sources.[1]
Read moreRelated publications
EBRD support for Kolubara paving the “ash way” for development of Serbia
Briefing | 21 November, 2011 | Download PDFLinked to a slew of controversies, the Kolubara lignite mining project in Serbia is in line for support from European public banks. Corruption allegations, pollution at local level, irregularities in resettlement of local populations and not to forget a climate damaging approach to energy investments should be reason enough to find alternative options. An updated version of this briefing is available here (May 12, 2012).
Letter to EBRD re complaints against Sostanj power plant project
Advocacy letter | 16 November, 2011 | Download PDFThe letter notifies the EBRD of two complaints filed against the Sostanj lignite thermal power plant unit 6 project and calls on the EBRD to also undertake a thorough review of its involvement in the project, as it seems that when approving the project, some relevant facts were omitted by the bank.
