Ugljevik power plant, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Commissioned in 1985, the 300 MW coal power plant in Ugljevik, Bosnia and Herzegovina, has become famous for emitting more sulphur dioxide than all of Germany’s coal power plants in 2019.

Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
To put things in perspective, for every GWh of electricity generated in 2019, Ugljevik emitted 50 tonnes of sulphur dioxide, that is 50 times more than EU’s worst polluter, Bełchatów in Poland, which emitted 1.1 tonnes of SO2/GWh.
The problem is not new, but the paradox is that a financing contract for installing desulphurisation (de-SOx) equipment at Ugljevik was signed more than 14 years ago, and the installation is still not functioning.
Financed by a loan from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) signed back in 2009, works on the de-SOx equipment started only in 2017 and test operations began in December 2019. It seemed likely that in 2020, SO2 emissions would be significantly lower, finally justifying the EUR 85 million investment.
However, in February 2020 technical problems were reported. The plant’s dust filters, overhauled more than three years ago by the Czech company Termochem at a cost of around EUR 10 million, were faulty, and their proper functioning is reported to be a precondition for desulphurisation. The plant operator spent an additional EUR 100,000 on a study that would show how to address the problem.
In 2021, RiTE Ugljevik, the power plant operator, sought ‘technical assistance’ to obtain the operating permit, adding an extra EUR 100,000 to the costs of this project. The contract was awarded to a company owned by the mayor of Zvornik, raising a host of questions on why the publicly-owned utility RiTE Ugljevik is not capable of obtaining an operating permit itself.
The plant finally obtained an operating permit for the desulphurisation equipment in November 2021. However, its 2024 sulphur dioxide emissions of 112,943 tonnes higher than those in 2021 (86,774 tonnes). Since 2018, when the Large Combustion Plants Directive entered force under the Energy Community Treaty plant’s emissions have increased instead of decreasing. The operator admits that the de-SOX is not working mainly because it is an ‘economic burden’, and also due to a lack of disposal facilities for the gypsum that results from the process.
Out of all Bosnia and Herzegovina’s coal power plants, Ugljevik’s emissions caused the most days of asthmatic symptoms in children, with over 12,000 days in 2020. This is equal to 48 per cent of all such impacts from the country’s coal power plants which are included in the National Emissions Reduction Plan. Ugljevik is also responsible for the highest number of cases of bronchitis in children due to dust emissions, and of hospital admissions because of cardiovascular and respiratory symptoms, with 1,142 cases of the former and 469 of the latter in 2020.
Latest news
Western Balkans coal plants continue to breach pollution limits despite legal deadlines, report says
Bankwatch in the media | 8 July, 2026Coal-fired power plants across the Western Balkans emitted sulphur dioxide at more than six times legal limits in 2025, with dust pollution reaching its worst level since current emissions rules came into force eight years ago.
Read moreWestern Balkan governments must finally penalise illegal coal pollution – new report
Press release | 22 June, 2026In 2025, systematic law enforcement failures allowed sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the Western Balkans’ ageing coal power plants to exceed legal limits by 6.6 times, according to the eighth edition of Bankwatch’s Comply or Close report, published today (1). Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions also continued to breach legal limits, while dust pollution increased, reaching the highest level since the current rules entered force in 2018.
Read moreThe Trump peace pipelines framework: a renewed threat to Western Balkan decarbonisation
Blog entry | 19 June, 2026The Western Balkan countries have low or no fossil gas dependence, but the United States is trying to change this. As a major gas producer, its approach to the region is increasingly clashing with the EU’s decarbonisation agenda, raising the threat of increased import dependence or stranded assets.
Read moreRelated publications
Comments on the Environmental Impact Assessment of Sostanj thermal power plant project
Policy comments | 15 February, 2010 | Download PDFThese comments by Slovenian NGO Focus – Association for Sustainable Development outlines concerns regarding the Sostanj project’s financial picture and its compliance with the climate and energy objectives of Slovenia. They also express serious doubts about the actual necessity of the project.
