Bankwatch

Home > Publications > Applying the ‘do no significant harm’ principle in practice: examples of reforms and investments under national recovery plans that will cause harm to the environment

Applying the ‘do no significant harm’ principle in practice: examples of reforms and investments under national recovery plans that will cause harm to the environment

Applying the ‘do no significant harm’ principle in practice: examples of reforms and investments under national recovery plans that will cause harm to the environment

Advocacy letter    |    8 March 2022

Download

This joint letter, prepared by CEE Bankwatch Network, EuroNatur, WWF and ReCommon, raises concern about the application of the EU’s ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). The letter is accompanied by a series of examples of reforms and investments from eight Member States set to be financed through the recovery fund, and details the negative impact these will have on the environment and climate based on similar, previously financed measures.

Case studies:

Never miss an update

We expose the risks of international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground. We believe that the billions of public money should work for people and the environment.

More about our work

More about us

STAY INFORMED





By clicking accept, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

We use cookies to: - Better understand and store user’s preferences for future visits. - Gather statistical data about site traffic and user behaviour and interactions in order to offer better site experiences and tools in the future. We may also use trusted third-party services that track this information on our behalf. You can enable your device to notify you each time a cookie is being sent by changing your browser settings. If you turn cookies off, It won’t affect the user’s experience .

Close