• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
  • Donate
  • Русский

Home > Archives for Blog entry

Nenskra-greenery.jpg

Who really benefits from Georgia’s Nenskra hydropower plant?

May 4, 2017 | Read more

The Nenskra hydropower plant is implemented by two state-owned institutions and likely to be funded by several publicly owned development banks. Nonetheless, information about the contested project is being held back from public scrutiny.

Roofs in different colours stretching to the horizon.

Doing the same thing and expecting different results: Mongolia plans to curb air pollution with more coal

May 3, 2017 | Read more

A new law on air pollution recently adopted by the Mongolian government is in part the result of massive demonstrations against air pollution in the capital. The new policy, however, involves even more reliance on coal.

A person with a clown's nose holding a banner with the text "$ Green Climate Fund"

National and local levels play secondary role in Green Climate Fund, European Investment Bank project illustrates

April 25, 2017 | Read more

The use of international financial institutions to manage projects within the Green Climate Fund framework has been criticised as too far removed from communities and those affected by the investments. Recently approved projects, the biggest of them administered by the European Investment Bank confirm this view, despite willingness to include civil society.

Olive trees on the contested area where the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline is supposed to be built.

Why no Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (NO TAP), here or elsewhere

April 13, 2017 | Read more

This article first appeared on the Re:Common website. It was the end of February and the scene is Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. During an official meeting, the Italian government was severely criticised for the considerable delays in the constructio

Three cooling towers from the Tuzla lignite power plant.

Balkans are gambling on coal as EU utilities opt out

April 12, 2017 | Read more

Eurelectric members have pledged to build no new coal power stations from 2020. So why do firms in Serbia and Bosnia still think they can make coal pay?

A small group of people, seen from behind, looking down into a coal mining pit.

Making the coal phase out fair for workers – unions, companies and environmentalists discuss just transition in Romania

April 11, 2017 | Read more

A Romanian coal mining region is writing history today as representatives from unions, the coal industry and environmental organisations are coming together for the first time to discuss their communities’ future – with a common goal in mind.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube