Home >> Our Work >> Projects >> Pljevlja II lignite power plant, Montenegro

Pljevlja II lignite power plant, Montenegro


View of Pljevlia and the existing power plant.

Although the project is at an early stage of the permitting process, several issues have already emerged.


Now that Czech export credit support for Pljevlja has been cancelled, the project's financing is on very weak footing.

In October 2016 it was reported that the Czech Export Bank and export credit agency EGAP had decided not to finance the project. It now remains unclear who is ready to take on such an uneconomic project in a town with a heavy environmental legacy. Pljevlja needs a just transition to a cleaner economy, not another coal plant.


Economic only with creative accounting – threat of stranded assets

In summer 2016, the Montenegrin government published an analysis purporting to show that Pljevlja II would be an economic investment. However, even a brief examination of the document showed that this is extremely unlikely:

    If Montenegro somehow manages to delay the implementation of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme until 2026 and
    If electricity prices more than double by 2040 and
    If CO2 costs are 10% lower than projected and
    If Pljevlja mine manages to reduce production costs from 24.21 EUR/tonne to 17.5 EUR/tonne within the next ten years and
    If no VAT is paid for the EPC contract,
    Then the Pljevlja II power plant might just turn out economically viable.

As well as the general unlikelihood of all the above coinciding, there is no real overall need for a new coal plant in Montenegro. The future of Montenegro's largest electricity consumer, the Podgorica Aluminium Factory (KAP) is in question and it seems unlikely to function in the medium-long term, which will make a significant impact on demand.

In addition, official documents are unclear on whether the rehabilitation of the existing Pljevlja power plant is planned. If it is, the new unit is almost certainly unnecessary. If it isn’t, Montenegro can cover its demand with additional energy efficiency, wind and solar within a few years if it steps up its level of activity in this field.

Montenegrin decision-makers often highlight the idea of exporting electricity, however an analysis by the University of Groningen and consultancy The Advisory House has shown that for the next ten years at least, there is likely to be a surplus of electricity in the EU, thus it is questionable whether there will be a market for potential electricity exports from Montenegro and other Balkan countries.

Read more
Stranded assets in the Western Balkans - report on the long-term economic viability of new export capacities
Study | March 19, 2015

 

Insufficient economic lignite reserves for the lifetime of the plant

Official documents related to the 254 MW Pljevlja II lignite power plant count all lignite reserves in the Pljevlja area as being available for the use of the plant. However they do not take account of the fact that some of the deposits have been already found to be uneconomic and that the existing power plant will still use up more lignite before the end of its lifetime.

Confronted with this issue, in 2016 EPCG changed its tactic and commissioned Fichtner to come up with a study on how to make the mine deposits economically feasible. Fichtner found that the Pljevlja mine would have to reduce production costs from 24.21 EUR/tonne to 17.5 EUR/tonne within the next ten years, and that one of the ways to do this would be by reducing the number of employees from 872 in mid-2016 to somewhere between 520 and 544 by around 2025. It is unclear whether this can be achieved or not. In addition, the government is in denial, promising new jobs with Pljevlja II while in reality the number of jobs will shrink, whether it is built or not. There is no plan how to carry out this reduction in a socially responsible and inclusive manner.

Read more
Deceptive promises of new jobs in the coal sector don't help workers, communities or the climate
Blog post | November 14, 2016

 

The environmental situation in Pljevlja will be further worsened

As Montenegro plans to join the EU around 2020, all new investments need to be in line with EU standards. However Pljevlja already suffers from serious air pollution [Montenegrin language] which is far away from EU ambient air quality standards.

The town is situated in a depression at around 720 m above sea level, and is prone to temperature inversion and smog. Thus the existing power plant has a disproportionate negative impact on local air quality.

While the new plant is claimed to be less polluting than the existing one, the Montenegrin government has not made any commitment on when it will close the existing plant and in various documents has mentioned 2018, 2025 and 2030. In the latter two cases, the existing plant would run parallel to the new one, thus worsening air quality even further.

In addition to the air quality problems mentioned above, the existing plant has left other serious legacies which pose risks for local people and the plant and mine owners.

The most visible is the massive Jagnjilo spoil tip, consisting of an estimated 70,000,000 tonnes of marl waste dug out from the lignite mine which causes dust to blow around on windy days. Local people report that in 2005-2006 – presumably due to the pressure caused by the weight of this tip – a 5-m wide rift in the ground downhill from the heap opened up, which has now been filled in with rock waste.

Ash pond pollutes the air

A Montenegrin TV reportage showing pollution and people affected by the ash pond.

The Maljevac ash pond serving the existing power plant is within just a few metres of the nearest houses and the ash is often not adequately covered with water, so that it too blows around in windy weather. People in Pljevlja complain of a high rate of illness, especially in the village of Zbljevo next to the ash pond, and there are concerns about the stability of the earth bank around the landfill. EPCG is currently attempting to obtain agreement from the Ministry of Environment to expand the landfill upwards.

Non-standard tender process

Instead of conducting a formal tender process for the main contractor in the Pljevlja II project, the Montenegro government chose a company through an informal selection process that lacked clear deadlines and specifications.

Several companies submitted preliminary offers for plants ranging between 220 and 350 MW and three companies – China's CMEC and Hubei-Powerchina and the Czech Skoda Praha - were shortlisted. A contract was signed with Skoda Praha in September 2016, which reportedly included an obligation for Skoda to find financing for the project. After the Czech Export Bank declined financing in November 2016, Skoda Praha’s future in the project is now uncertain.

Share:

Latest developments


 

Blog entry | August 17, 2017

New EU rules entering into force today, to limit pollution from power plants, will also apply in most Western Balkan countries. But the region’s governments are so far acting like they don’t exist.

Blog entry | June 26, 2017

Results of more than half a year of independent air pollution monitoring in the Balkans have been launched today. During a conference at the European Parliament, MEPs, European Commission and Energy Community representatives, NGOs and citizens groups called for urgent action on air pollution in the Western Balkans.

Blog entry | June 26, 2017

In the Western Balkans, air pollution can be a fatal problem, made worse by some of those countries’ energy policies. Ioana Ciuta sheds light on the region’s developing crisis, which is claiming lives at an alarming rate.

Blog entry | June 16, 2017

Almost all the countries in the Balkan region are planning to build new coal power plants, but there has been virtually no mention of the need for them to comply with new pollution standards.

Press release | June 14, 2017

Almost none of the new coal power plants planned in the Western Balkans will meet new, stricter EU pollution standards, according to a new analysis by CEE Bankwatch Network, released today.

Download the analysis as pdf.

Publications

Briefing | June 26, 2017

Bankwatch and our partner organisations have undertaken independent dust monitoring in Balkan countries and we have found worrying levels of particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5), dust so small it enters deep into our lungs and blood streams causing irreversible damage and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

Study | June 14, 2017

The new reference document on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants (LCP BREF) and its implications for new coal.

Briefing | June 1, 2017

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Romania all plan new lignite power plants during the next few years. In contrast, most EU countries are giving up building new coal plants and seven EU states are already coal-free. Since the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank have virtually halted lending for new coal power plants, most of them are due to be financed by Chinese state banks – ExIm Bank and the China Development Bank.

Briefing | March 29, 2017

This briefing analyses ten coal-fired power plant projects across the Western Balkans and finds that, once the cost of carbon emissions allowances are factored in, they could become a serious liability for both the companies involved and the public.

Briefing | November 14, 2016

Coal is the single biggest contributor to global climate change. But governments and investors planning new coal capacities have a range of flimsy arguments why coal would be the best or the only alternative. This briefing busts a number of myths surrounding coal, such as "coal is cheap", "alleviates poverty" or "coal is clean".