• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
  • Русский
Home > Projects > Khudoni hydropower plant, Georgia

Khudoni hydropower plant, Georgia

While a mountain community will have to be forced to resettle for this mega-project, the opaque ownership and weak taxation mean that benefits for Georgia are highly doubtful.

Svaneti-panorama.jpg
Photo: A mountain range in Svaneti, Georgia, where the Khudoni hydropower plant is to be built.

Stay informed

We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.





Key facts

Size and costs:
With the planned 200.5 meter-tall arch dam, an underground powerhouse, and a 528 hectare water reservoir the Khudoni HPP would become the second largest hydropower plant in Georgia.

The costs are estimated at EUR 1.06 billion (GEL 2.75 billion).

Feasibility:
The project requires the resettlement of 2000 people, will negatively affect cultural heritage and will not bring significant tax revenues for Georgia.

The positive conclusions of a feasibility study on Khudoni’s technical and financial viability are being questions by observers as well as local communities.

Promoter & financiers:
The project company’s beneficial owners are unknown, as are the financiers of the project. (The World Bank provided technical assistance for the feasibility study.)

The Georgian state provided 24 percent of the project costs without receiving a share in the project company or similar compensation.

Key issues

  • About 2000 locals to be displaced by the dam. Their fierce opposition has triggered a nation-wide discussion about Khudoni. more>>
  • Government responds with intimidation and PR campaigns. more >>
  • Project’s benefits for Georgia’s public are very limited with low taxation and project company registered offshore. more >>
  • Project likely to have adverse impacts on water streams, local culture and geological stability. more >>

Background

The 702 MW Khudoni hydropower plant (HPP) is proposed to be built on the Enguri River in the picturesque mountain region of upper Svaneti in Georgia. The area is inhabited by the Svans, an ethnic group which has retained its language and traditions over centuries.

The Khudoni HPP will resettle around 2000 people and flood some of the villages threatening to corrode traditional lifestyles of the Svans and destroy pristine nature.

Displacement and locals’ fierce opposition

The Khudoni HPP will displace around 2000 people (of the 12 000 who live in Upper Svaneti). A village to be fully resettled is Kaishi with its 800 inhabitants.

One fifth of Khaishi’s households is recorded as socially vulnerable and is living on allowances, the majority relying on agriculture for their subsistence. They fear that their situation will only deteriorate with the resettlement.

Supported by numerous other Svan communities, the people from Kaishi are fiercely opposing the Khudoni hydropower plant and have organised numerous public protests, rallies and blockades.

In 2013, 200 families of Khaishi even took a traditional oath in church, vowing they would protect Kaishi from flooding or, should they fail, face a curse that will haunt them and their families for generations.

People shouting and protesting with placards with Georgian letters.
Protests at a consultation meeting in Kaishi in summer 2013.
A woman lighting a candle in a church.

A worshiper during mass in Chuberi, a town upstream from Khaishi.

Svans are known for being proud of and closely attached to their region.

Read more

Growing solidarity with local communities in Georgia puts Khudoni dam in spotlight
Blog post | October 4, 2013

Georgian government and investors reject Ombudsman’s offer to mediate in controversy over Khudoni mega dam
Blog post | February 6, 2014

Read more

People from Kaishi are being supported by other Svans and increasingly by public opinion in Georgia, despite intensive PR campaigns by the project promoters.

Growing solidarity with local communities in Georgia puts Khudoni dam in spotlight
Blog post | October 4, 2013

Georgian government and investors reject Ombudsman’s offer to mediate in controversy over Khudoni mega dam
Blog post | February 6, 2014

Promoters of mega-dam in Georgia use front group and PR campaign and discredit local community
Blog post | February 27, 2014

Intimidation and lack of communication

The project promoters’ unwillingness to respond to locals’ concerns has further deepened the mistrust and disagreement.

The project company Trans Electrica has failed to communicate the project’s effects and has not disclosed clear plans for compensation or resettlement.

Georgian authorities, instead of working with locals, responded to protests with increased police presence and intimidation. Georgia’s deputy minister of energy even told locals before a public hearing in September 2013 that regardless of their protests, the Khudoni dam will be built anyway.

Read more:

In Georgia, dam builders do not welcome peoples’ concerns
Blog post | September 24, 2013

A group of protesters standing around a man in a suit.
Georgia's deputy minister of energy tells locals at a consultation meeting that the Khudoni dam will be built regardless of their protests.
A man working on a field with his daughter watching.

More than 1500 ha land, part of which was traditionally owned by the local population yet not officially registered, were sold by the Georgian state to Trans Electrica for one dollar.

Locals had not been informed about the deal.

Doubtful public benefits & dodgy company

Most of the benefits that the Khudoni HPP is supposed to provide for Georgia and local municipalities are highly doubtful.

Energy independence?

The contract signed by the concessionaire and the Georgian government will award 91 percent of the Khudoni generated electricity for exports. Georgia is only guaranteed to buy annually 133.9 mln kw/h (or only four days of power consumption in Georgia) at a fixed price of 5.84 US cents during the first ten years.

Tax revenues?

While electricity exports will improve Georgia’s trade balance, they will not generate fiscal benefits for the country as export is factually exempt from taxation with a tax rate of zero percent.

Apart from income tax on salaries, Trans Electrica Ltd. will only pay a property tax of 1 percent. It will not pay for the water usage.

Employment?

The experience with other Georgian hydropower projects such as Larsi, Paravani and Dariali (pdf) have shown that employment opportunities tend to be exaggerated and mostly limited to the construction phase. The operation of Khudoni will require skilled work force which is likely to come from far away.

Offshore company

The project company, Trans Electrica Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, is represented by Indian nationals who have been so far silent about the beneficial owners of the company and the sources of financing.

The terms of the agreement for the construction of Khudoni HPP on a build, own and operate basis has been changed several times by the Georgian government and Trans Electrica Ltd. The project is heavily delayed but it is unclear whether the company has paid any penalties for delayed works.

Registered in the British virgin islands, the company’s beneficial owners and the sources of financing are so far unknown.

Independent review

In 2013, the Georgian government requested the Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment to review the draft Khudoni HPP Environmental and Social Impact Assessment.

The group suggested

  • better and transparent communication with locals,
  • a social cost-benefit analysis to assess the project’s feasibility from a public perspective, and
  • developing a national energy strategy that takes alternatives to Khudoni into account

Download the report

Impacts on water, culture and geology

Cumulative impacts on water streams

The Enguri river already hosts the world’s sixth highest arch dam, the 1300 MW Enguri HPP, and the 240 MW Vardnili hydropower cascade.

In addition to Khudoni, nine other hydropower plants (including three large dams with reservoirs) are being planned.

When combined, the plants will have significant impacts on water resources and the environment. However, the Ministry of Energy has not assessed the cumulative impacts of these installations.

Cultural impacts

Upper Svaneti is a candidate site to be listed by the UNESCO World Heritage for its natural importance and well-preserved medieval architecture.

While the dam is outside of the UNESCO site boundaries, the construction of a hydropower plant will interfere with the cultural sites (according to the official scoping document (pdf)). Twenty-seven villages will be impacted directly and indirectly by the project, including Khaishi which is regarded as a political and cultural gateway to Svaneti.

Khaishi’s church of St. George, Lakhani’s church of St. Nicholas, a cemetery and archaeological sites will be flooded.

Seismic risks and land slides

Severe landslides, rock falls and erosion were observed upstream of the Khudoni site. Combined with the high sediment load on the Enguri River, the high geological risks could decisively shorten the lifetime of the Khudoni reservoir.

Svaneti is a seismically active zone and a possible dam failure could result in flooding of vast areas in the western part of the country.

A large medieval stone tower in front of a mountain range. A Georgian flag is hanging on its side.
The Svaneti region is famous for it’s medieval stone towers.

Latest news

​​​​​​​​​​​​​Skavica mega dam: Albanian court to scrutinise special law for U.S. contractor Bechtel

Press release | 21 September, 2023

Nature conservation and human rights organisations have secured an important first milestone in the fight against the planned 210 MW Skavica hydropower plant in the Albanian municipalities of Kukës and Dibër.

Read more

Chinese-built Dabar hydropower plant in Bosnia and Herzegovina set to destroy four Emerald and two Ramsar sites

Blog entry | 31 July, 2023

If completed, the EUR 338 million project would violate a Recommendation of the Bern Convention No. 217 (2022) and leave tributaries of the Neretva river without water. People living in the Nevesinjsko karst field oppose resettlement and flooding of their houses and land.

Read more

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s draft NECP: The good, the bad and the ugly

Blog entry | 20 July, 2023

Bosnia and Herzegovina’s draft NECP finally looks to the future, plans no new fossil fuel power plants and significantly scales back unrealistic hydropower plans. But existing coal plants are to keep operating illegally and the draft is furtive about coal-to-biomass plans.

Read more

« Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • ...
  • 43
Next Page »

Related publications

Kungrad 1-3 wind power project, Uzbekistan

Policy comments | 11 March, 2025 | Download PDF

Kungrad is one of several large-scale renewable projects featuring extensive transmission lines slated for remote, wild areas in Central Asia – an alarming practice that hinders the sustainable energy transition.


How to interact with development banks lending to hydropower projects in Central Asia: A toolkit for civil society activists

Toolkit | 3 February, 2025 | Download PDF

This toolkit is aimed primarily at civil society organisations in Central Asia tackling the construction of dams or other unsustainable water infrastructure.


The Upper Horizons complex, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Briefing | 18 December, 2023 | Download PDF

The Upper Horizons hydropower complex has been planned since the mid-20th century, and is planned to consist of three plants — Dabar, Nevesinje and Bileća — linked by a series of tunnels and channels. If completed, it would have a devastating impact on the karst ecosystems of eastern Herzegovina and beyond.  


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • ...
  • 27
Next Page »

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube