Pljevlja I power plant, Montenegro
The existing 225 MW Pljevlja thermal power plant in the north of Montenegro, near the borders with Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, has been operating since 1982. The plant was originally planned to comprise two units but the second one was never built. The plant, along with the extensive use of coal and wood for heating, has caused unbearably bad air quality in the town.

Photo: RTE Pljevlja
Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
Montenegro’s only coal power plant – the 225 MWe Pljevlja I – was commissioned in 1982 and generates around 40 per cent of Montenegro’s electricity, depending on the year.
Even though the plant should have been brought into compliance with the Large Combustion Plants Directive by 2018, the government and the plant’s operator Elektroprivreda Crne Gore (EPCG) lost several years concentrating on the construction of the now-cancelled Pljevlja II, and did not pay sufficient attention to resolving Pljevlja I’s pollution issues.
Therefore, the ‘limited lifetime derogation’ option was chosen as a way to comply with the Directive, in which Pljevlja I would be able to operate for a total of 20,000 hours between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023. After that, it either had to close or to undergo a retrofit that would bring it into compliance with emission limit values for new plants, not existing ones.
In March 2018, Montenegro’s Environmental Protection Agency issued the Pljevlja I plant with an integrated environmental permit, which stipulated that it must comply with the 2017 EU LCP BREF standards by 2023 – the most recent best available technology applicable. As such, it is the first existing plant in the region which has been required to do so.
In June 2020 Montenegro’s previous government signed a contract with a consortium led by China’s Dongfang (DEC International) to retrofit the plant to bring it in line with the EU’s 2017 LCP BREF.
However, EPCG has never publicly proven that the investment is be economically justified, nor that it would be technically capable of bringing the plant into compliance. At the time of signing, it was also claimed that this investment would extend the lifetime of the plant by 30 years, which seems highly unlikely. The plant is too old to operate for so long in its current state, but the works did not include reconstruction of the main parts of the plant, such as the boiler.
In the meantime, instead of spreading the available 20,000 hours evenly over the whole period from 2018 to 2023, the operator used them up as quickly as possible. By the end of 2020, the plant had already operated for 21,003 hours since 1 January 2018, but it did not stop there.
In March 2021, when Montenegro had to report its operating data to the European Environment Agency under the Energy Community Treaty, the breach was confirmed, yet the plant has continued to operate. In April 2021, the Energy Community Secretariat opened an infringement procedure against Montenegro.
Additionally, in April 2021, the Ministry for Capital Investments asked the public prosecutor to investigate the tender process for the plant’s retrofit, as well as the fact that EPCG used up all its hours in three years instead of spreading them out until the modernisation project was ready to start. The results of the investigation are not yet known.
In June 2021 Montenegro announced it will wean itself off coal by 2035, however, a public tender was actually opened in November 2021 for a feasibility study looking into connecting the existing plant to a new district heating system in Pljevlja, a project that EPCG has been promising the local community for 40 years, but whose construction would not even be finalised before the phase-out year.
In 2020 alone, as a result of the Pljevlja plant’s emissions, over EUR 1.3 billion were incurred in health costs by Montenegro and other countries. The estimated 625 deaths in 2020 make up almost 95 per cent of these costs, whilst the estimated 1,162 bronchitis cases in children due to PM10 amount to just over EUR 0.4 million.
Over 1 million restricted activity or lost work days are estimated, costing Montenegro’s and other countries’ economies EUR 51.3 million. In 2020, there were an estimated 12,257 days of asthma symptoms in asthmatic children, and a total of 436 cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions.
At the end of March 2025, the Pljevlja plant was taken offline for the main part of the modernisation works. After testing started at the end of November 2025, local people reported major pollution incidents.
In December 2025 – almost a year and a half after the deadline – Montenegro finally adopted its National Energy and Climate Plan, which plans the closure of the Pljevlja plant only in 2040 – unrealistically late considering its age and the impacts of carbon pricing.
Latest news
Fear and fossil fuels in Romania
Blog entry | 11 February, 2026A draft law supported by thirty members of the Parliament, aims to roll back Romania’s coal phase out and, at the same time, delivers a masterclass in manipulation.
Read moreJoint NGO statement: New EU budget must ensure dedicated funds for environmental protection and just transition in the Western Balkans
Press release | 28 May, 202568 civil society organisations have today issued a joint statement calling on the EU to ensure dedicated funds for environmental protection and just transition of coal-dependent regions in the Western Balkans in the post-2027 EU budget.
Read moreConcerns raised over new coal mining project in light of North Macedonia’s decarbonisation goals
Blog entry | 27 May, 2025CEE Bankwatch Network and Eko-svest have recently raised serious concerns regarding a proposed coal mining project in North Macedonia. The plan to open a new lignite mine in the Pelagonija region comes as a surprise, as the region is already affected by three other operating mines and the project contradicts the country’s coal phase-out commitments.
Read moreRelated publications
High risk of corruption in Sostanj TES 6: Report by Slovenian Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (unofficial translation)
Official document | 23 February, 2012 | Download PDFFor many years TES 6 has been surrounded by rumours of corruption. In February 2012 the Slovene State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption published a report stating that acts of corruption could have influenced the awarding of the contract to French company ALSTOM and that the law on the state guarantee itself was initially drafted by employees of HSE, the owner of the Sostanj power complex. Slovene NGO Focus Association for Sustainable Development has translated the report to English. (The original report (in Slovenian language) is available for download here (pdf).)
Complaint to EBRD’s Public Complaint Mechanism: The Sostanj thermal power plant project
Official document | 17 January, 2012 | Download PDFBankwatch, Slovenian NGO Focus and Environmental Legal Service (CZ) ask the EBRD’s Project Complaint Mechanism to undertake a compliance review of whether the bank has complied with its Environmental and Social Policy 2008 in relation to two aspects of the Sostanj lignite thermal power plant: (a) Claims by the EBRD that the project in question is “CCS ready” and (b) the EBRD’s assessment of whether Slovenia can fulfil its obligations in meeting long-term EU climate goals if it undertakes the project.
Complaint regarding Sostanj TES6: CCS, public procurement, economic vialbility
Official document | 9 January, 2012 | Download PDFThe complaint, filed with the European Investment Bank by Environmental Law Service (CZ) and Focus Association for Sustainable Development (SI), outlines controversies in relation to the Sostanj lignite thermal power plant with regards to the following aspects: insubstantial allegation that the project is „carbon capture ready“ and that the assessment submitted by the operator fulfils the criteria set up by the relevant EU Directive, failure to comply with the relevant EU directive for public procurements, questionable economic viability of the project.
