Bosnia’s planned Tuzla 7 lignite plant on the rocks after state aid U-turn

The State Aid Council’s 2018 decision to greenlight the loan guarantee was found in breach of State aid legislation by the Energy Community Secretariat in an infringement case against Bosnia and Herzegovina at the Ministerial Council in November 2021.

The case was opened based on a complaint by the Aarhus Centre Sarajevo and Bankwatch. In its decision, the Ministerial Council found that Bosnia and Herzegovina failed to comply with its obligations under Article 18 of the Treaty, on the prohibition of market-distorting State aid.

The guarantee for Tuzla 7 covered 100 percent of the loan, plus interest and other associated costs, but as a contracting party to the Energy Community treaty, Bosnia and Herzegovina must follow EU rules on subsidies in the energy sector. One of them is that in most cases state guarantees may only cover up to 80 percent of the total loan amount.

Tuzla 7’s woes were compounded last year when it was revealed that the contractor itself, China’s Gezhouba, can no longer fulfil its contract due the withdrawal of GE as an equipment supplier. However, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina government and parliament appear reluctant to take a final decision on the fate of the project.

Pippa Gallop of CEE Bankwatch Network – ‘We very much welcome this decision by the State Aid Council and hope it signals the end of the unfortunate Tuzla 7 saga. Cutting the project’s lifelines is the sensible thing to do so that Bosnia and Herzegovina can move on to more environmentally and economically sound energy planning.’

Denis Žiško, Aarhus Centre in Bosnia and Herzegovina – ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina’s energy sector must now do an about-turn. Our decision makers need to speed up sustainable renewables and energy efficiency like they mean it – we can no longer waste time on polluting and expensive projects.’

Boris Mrkela of Just Finance International – ‘The State Aid Council’s decision sheds light on the Chinese leadership’s unwillingness to go through with Xi Jinping’s pledge to stop financing new coal power plants abroad. Bosnian taxpayers deserve a better insight into how their money is spent and the risk with large loans for heavily polluting investments and untransparent business deals such as Tuzla 7.’

Contacts

Pippa Gallop, CEE Bankwatch Network,
pippa.gallop@bankwatch.org
+385 99 755 9787
Skype: pippa.gallop

Denis Žiško, Aarhus Centre in Bosnia and Herzegovina
denis.z@bih.net.ba
Skype: denis.zisko
Mob: +387 61 140 655

Boris Mrkela, Just Finance International
boris@justfinanceinternational.org
+387 61 90 28 60

Notes for editors:

More information on the Energy Community case can be found at: Case ECS-10/18, https://www.energy-community.org/legal/cases/2018/case1018BH.html