• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos

Home > Archives for Press release

Press release

New report: proposed EU carbon tax to speed up energy transition in the Western Balkans

The report offers an overview of all six Western Balkan countries’ electricity sectors and their trade with the EU energy market. It finds that the six countries exported 88 terawatt hours of electricity into the EU from 2011 to 2020, amounting to 12.7 percent of total power generation in the Western Balkans. Over 60 per cent of this electricity is coal-based, so the EU has played a significant role in sustaining coal-based electricity in the region. 

If the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)1 enters into force in 2026 as the EU has proposed, and the electricity exported by the region to the EU is taxed by the EU instead of the Western Balkan governments, the countries would lose over EUR 500 million annually to the EU budget. If the countries are to avoid being hit by CBAM, planning a just transition and introducing carbon pricing is more important than ever. 

‘The energy crisis in the Western Balkans is diverting governments’ attention, but the fact remains that coal is no longer a reliable, cheap and abundant source of electricity, and CBAM will only exacerbate this. Governments must take the initiative now if they want to use carbon pricing to fund the transition instead of letting the EU reap the revenues from CBAM’, said Pippa Gallop, Southeast Europe energy adviser and one of the report co-authors. 

According to the Commission’s proposal, the EU will start imposing charges on electricity imports in 2026, with higher impacts on countries with higher exports, higher emissions and a higher percentage of fossil fuels used in electricity generation.  

Bosnia and Herzegovina is the largest electricity exporter in the Western Balkans and a consistent net electricity exporter, with approximately 20 percent of its electricity going to the EU from 2011 to 2020.  

Montenegro’s electricity exports to the EU were non-existent before November 2019, when it completed its interconnection with Italy. Exports increased drastically to over 50 percent of the country’s entire generation in 2020. This generation is reliant on the illegally operated Pljevlja coal power plant, which has exhausted its allowance of 20,000 operating hours since January 2018 under the Energy Community Treaty. In other words, profitable exports to the EU are encouraging this illegal operation.  

The region was hit hard by a quadruple energy crisis caused by high prices of electricity imported from the EU in the last year, a series of technical problems at coal power plants and mines across the region, a terribly dry year for hydropower production and a massive increase in biomass prices. Still, the energy transition is slowly taking off the ground, as wind and solar development is speeding up in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia and Serbia. However, the threat of a delayed coal phase-out is looming. 

The report recommends that the EU increases momentum towards a just and sustainable energy transition and carbon pricing, especially through the creation of a dedicated Just Transition Fund. It also needs to ensure a stringent CBAM which will persuade decision makers in the Western Balkans to introduce their own carbon pricing and improve compliance with EU energy, competition and environmental law. 

‘The economic reality of coal operation, with stricter environmental standards and carbon pricing must prompt the Western Balkan countries to design just transition plans, to be funded through a dedicated Just Transition Fund. Such a fund is crucial to help the Western Balkan countries end their reliance on coal and address the social and economic impacts of such a change’, concluded Ioana Ciuta, energy coordinator for the Western Balkans, and one of the report co-authors. 

Contacts:

Ioana Ciuta, Energy coordinator for the Western Balkans, CEE Bankwatch Network
ioana.ciuta@bankwatch.org
Twitter: @unaltuser
Mob: +407 24 020 281

Pippa Gallop, Southeast Europe Energy Advisor, CEE Bankwatch Network
pippa.gallop@bankwatch.org
Twitter: @pippa.gallop
Mob: +385 99 755 9787

Romanian decision-makers attempt misuse of REPowerEU funds for illegal hydropower plants

Romania’s Government plans to use funds allocated under the REPowerEU package to build nine hydropower projects in protected natural areas, Bankwatch Romania has warned the European Commission today. Several of these projects have already been found illegal by the Romanian justice system. 

Purporting to tackle the energy crisis, two new draft laws and a draft government ordinance have been published, and may be approved as soon as 5 December. The ordinance would resurrect controversial hydropower plants started decades ago, including the Bumbesti-Livezeni plant in the Jiu Gorge National Park and the Rastolita plant in the Calimani-Gurghiu National Park. All the plants are promoted by state-owned Hidroelectrica.

The ordinance would exempt the plants from environmental assessments and allow Hidroelectrica to approve its own feasibility analyses. As well as the two national parks, the plants would seriously damage twenty Natura2000 sites, a Ramsar site and tens of rivers, one of which is the only known breeding site of the endangered Danube salmon in Romania. 

An annex to the draft ordinance also reveals Government plans to finance the plants using EU public funds, via the new recovery plan chapters soon to be submitted as part of the REPowerEU package. This will be subject to approval by the European Commission.

The Romanian Parliament already attempted to legalise these hydropower projects in February this year. A controversial law was adopted, allowing changes to the boundaries of protected natural areas and enabling the completion of the Jiu Gorge and Rastolita plants. The law was challenged by opposition party Union to Save Romania (USR), and in November the Constitutional Court ruled it unconstitutional on procedural grounds. Two senators immediately submitted new draft laws which contain the same provisions as the February law, and the government ordinance comes on top.

Ioana Ciuta, President of Bankwatch Romania: ‘The Government and Parliament’s latest moves to prop up Hidroelectrica’s decades-old illegal hydropower projects are a blatant abuse of the energy crisis. Even if construction resumed tomorrow, the projects would not be ready for at least another three years – far too late to help immediate security of supply. The European Commission must ensure that no public funds are used for this abomination.’ 

Pippa Gallop, Southeast Europe Energy Coordinator, CEE Bankwatch Network: ‘This is unfortunately not an isolated case of mis-using the energy crisis to trample over environmental legislation. It is extremely unhelpful that the European Commission itself is proposing to weaken EU nature safeguards via amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive as well, which sends a terrible signal to the Member States. Still, what Romania is planning is completely illegal and the European Commission must react promptly.’

For more information on the planned hydropower projects and emergency legislation, please see the attached briefing.

Contact:

Ioana Ciuta, President, Bankwatch Romania and Energy coordinator for the Western Balkans, CEE Bankwatch Network  
ioana.ciuta@bankwatch.org
Twitter: @unaltuser
Mob: +407 24 020 281 

 

Moving Western Balkan district heating systems away from fossil fuels   

This winter, surging energy costs serve as a stark reminder that we simply cannot rely on fossil fuels for heating. This is not just about finding energy sources at stable prices, but also significantly reducing carbon dioxide emissions, which make up 50 per cent of total emissions in the Western Balkans. There are better alternatives; district heating systems powered by renewable energy sources aren’t science fiction, but are in fact achievable right now.  

In an effort to help five city officials from Western Balkan countries improve their district heating systems using sustainable models in Denmark and Sweden as examples, CEE Bankwatch Network, Aarhus Center in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ekosvest in North Macedonia organised a tour with experts who work in the field. The participants – from the cities of Živinice and Tuzla (BiH), Pljevlja (Montenegro), and Kochani and Bitola (North Macedonia) – represent communities already interested in replacing outdated, polluting heating systems based on coal and fossil gas with newer, cleaner systems. 

Over the past week, the officials had a chance to see a solar-based district heating network and a thermal energy storage site in the town of Marstal, as well as a system based on heat pumps at the Copenhagen market and the world’s largest fossil-free district heating grid in Lund, Sweden. Some of these systems have been in operation for almost 10 years and show how sustainable district heating can exist in the form of feasible, affordable and bankable solutions within the community. 

Mayors and representatives of the local authorities shared their experience of shifting from heating systems that run on fossil fuels to others powered by renewable energy sources, including possible financing sources.  

Although the circumstances differ from place to place, all these projects are evidence that overhauling heating systems pays off and local residents feel the difference in the air they breathe and the bills they pay. The experience of municipalities in Denmark and Sweden indicates that embarking on such a transition depends not only on the availability of financing, but primarily on political will. Governments of Western Balkan countries must embark on a dedicated energy transition to secure independent and clean heating solutions for their towns. 

QUOTES FROM THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE STUDY VISIT: 

Nataša Kovačević, District Heating Coordinator at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: ‘With the enormous gas price increase looming and upcoming taxes on carbon emissions, there has never been a better time to start developing modern and completely new district heating systems based on renewables. This requires supportive policies, a strong legal framework and the capacity to use all available financing mechanisms, including the EU, the Western Balkans Investment Framework, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other funds from international financial institutions that are already available for all Western Balkan countries.’ 

Denis Žiško, Aarhus Center in Bosnia and Herzegovina, said: ‘It’s time to distance ourselves from the cavemen’s fascination with fire and accept that we don’t have to burn something to generate energy. The fact is that solar and wind energy combined with energy efficiency, heat pumps and heat storage are real, accessible and sustainable solutions for heating.’ 

Samir Kamenjaković, Mayor of Živinice Municipality, said: ‘The town of Živinice is committed to renewable energy sources, the circular economy and a just transition. The projects and plans that are already underway in Živinica have created the perfect platform for us to embark on projects and investments like those we have seen in Denmark, namely biomass projects and solar power plants.’ 

Ivan Chulakoski, City Councilor of Bitola Municipality in North Macedonia, said: ‘We had an opportunity to see with our own eyes that sustainable district heating can take different forms, but it is as feasible and affordable in Denmark and Sweden as it is in my town. Because Bitola is one of the most polluted cities in Europe, I think we must immediately prioritise this crucial transition.’ 

Dejan Rashkov, Secretary of the Municipality of Kochani in North Macedonia, said: ‘Kochani is currently developing a feasibility study for geothermal-based heating for the region’s agricultural area and a few urban locations. However, to fully develop this highly technical project, we need more substantial EU investments. Kochani has the advantage of having direct access to water at 78° Celsius, so we do not need to construct solar thermal storage facilities. However, heat pumps like those used in Marstal’s district heating system could increase efficiency and have a great positive effect on the local environment.’ 

Amel Husić, Chief of the Development Sector for Central Heating in Tuzla in Bosnia and Herzegovina, said: ‘The decentralisation and diversification of heat energy sources is extremely important for Tuzla’s district heating system needs to work on. The current global geopolitical situation shows that it is not good to be tied to one source of energy. On the study visit, we saw the city of Marstal, where solar collectors, thermal energy accumulation and heat pumps are all used in the district heating system. Each of these technologies is also applicable in Tuzla.’ 

Mervan Avdović, Executive Director of Heating Company ltd. in Pljevlja, Montenegro, said: ‘The visit was very successful; I saw with my own eyes technologies that I had only seen previously in energy magazines. I am grateful to CEE Bankwatch Network for enabling me to see all this. My task now is to try to apply everything I saw in my city and country.’ 

For more information contact: 

Natasa Kovačević, CEE Bankwatch Network  
natasa.kovacevic@bankwatch.org
Skype: natasa.green
Mob: +382 67 030 033     

Denis Žiško, Aarhus Centre in Bosnia and Herzegovina
denis.z@bih.net.ba
Skype: denis.zisko
Mob: +387 61 140 655 

Renewables to needlessly endanger EU protected natural areas: Reaction to today’s European Parliament committee vote on the Renewable Energy Directive

Among the measures backed in the committee vote is an extremely controversial article that would see all renewable energy projects presumed to be of ‘overriding public interest and serving public health and safety’ [1]. The vote still needs to be confirmed by the EU Parliament in plenary.

If these proposals make it into law, they would undermine rules that have been in place for decades and have proven their worth for protecting Europe’s stunning biodiversity. Currently, if a project is likely to have a significant impact on a Natura 2000 site, it is generally not allowed to go ahead, but there are exceptions, which are assessed on a case by case basis. 

The new rules create a special regime for renewables projects and render environmental assessments largely toothless, as no project will be deemed too harmful to go ahead. 

Andrey Ralev, Biodiversity Campaigner at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: ‘The new rules would trash decades of hard-won EU environmental safeguards. The revised Directive would only allow projects to go forward in areas where they should be prohibited, such as Natura 2000 sites with priority species, rivers with good water status, and areas crucial for bird populations.’

Pippa Gallop, Southeast Europe Energy Advisor at CEE Bankwatch Network, added: ‘EU legislation is already flexible enough to allow many renewable energy projects to be deemed of overriding public interest, so it is not even clear what will be achieved with these changes. Building damaging projects in Natura 2000 sites, areas crucial for birds and on pristine rivers will not massively increase the EU’s overall renewables output – it will just cause additional destruction of nature for very little gain.’  

Contacts:

Pippa Gallop
Southeast Europe Energy Advisor
CEE Bankwatch Network
pippa.gallop@bankwatch.org
+385 99 755 9787
Skype: pippa.gallop

[1] Bankwatch briefing Renewables automatically of ‘overriding public interest’ – a counterproductive attack on EU nature legislation

Reaction to European Parliament vote: Ensnaring the EU in a fossil fuel trap

Instead of leading the EU towards the phase-out of fossil fuels and towards just energy transformation, today’s vote opened the door for a new round of fossil fuel investments by exempting them from the ‘do no significant harm’ assessment.  

By exempting some fossil fuel projects, the European Parliament failed to ensure that the ‘do no significant harm’ principle, an environmental safeguard tool, applies to all EU funds investments. Although it tightened the rules compared to the European Commission proposal, Member States will still be allowed to exempt some fossil fuel investments such as gas pipelines and LNG terminals from complying with the principle.  

In terms of public participation, the European Parliament made significant improvements compared to the European Commission’s proposal, strengthening the provisions on public consultation, by including clear and mandatory guidelines to be followed in the preparation and implementation of the REPowerEU chapters.  

In the upcoming trilogue process on the recovery plan chapters, the Council of the European Union [2], the European Parliament and the European Commission [3] must stop financing fossil fuels from EU public funds and improve other problematic aspects of REPowerEU to ensure clear requirements for public participation, nature and climate protection.  

In parallel to the recovery fund chapters, the European Parliament is currently examining proposals to amend the Renewable Energy Directive, with the Industry, Research and Energy Committee (ITRE) expected to vote next week. The proposals undermine fundamental parts of EU environmental law protecting nature and the climate by creating a special permitting regime with exemptions and special treatment for the renewables sector. 

Christophe Jost, Senior EU Policy Officer at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: ‘Without public scrutiny, investments that have long-term and far-reaching consequences will continue to be approved behind closed doors. Although Parliament’s proposal improves the public participation aspect, the fight for the voice of people to be heard is not over. EU institutions must set an example for all Member States and open the process to the public.’ 

Pippa Gallop, Strategic Area Leader – Biodiversity and Finance at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: ‘The increase of renewables can’t be at the expense of nature. Undermining environmental safeguards to support REPowerEU’s renewable goals is a major and needless setback for nature protection. Existing EU legislation is more than flexible enough to allow renewables development and the European Parliament and the Council must uphold it if the EU is committed to the European Green Deal.’ 

Gligor Radečić, Gas Campaigner at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: ‘Some Member States are trying to solve the energy crisis with business-as-usual solutions – although it’s proven that they don’t work – instead of using public funds to speed up energy transition. Without the necessary safeguards in place REPowerEU national plans will exacerbate reliance on imported fossil fuels and deepen the existing energy crisis.’

For more information contact: 

Christophe Jost
Senior EU Policy Officer
christophe.jost@bankwatch.org
+32 (0)489 69 03 56 

Pippa Gallop
Strategic Area Leader – Biodiversity and Finance
pippa.gallop@bankwatch.org
+385 (0)99 755 9787 

Gligor Radečić
Gas Campaigner
gligor.radecic@bankwatch.org
+385 (0)97 745 4467 

Notes for editors 

[1] Text of the regulation –  REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/241 as regards REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060, Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 | A9-0260/2022 | European Parliament (europa.eu)  

[2] Position of the Council of the European Union on REPowerEU – st12662-re02-en22.pdf (europa.eu) 

[3] European Commission’s proposal – EUR-Lex – 52022PC0231 – EN – EUR-Lex (europa.eu) 

‘Destructive, undemocratic and possibly illegal’ – green groups slate leaked EU renewables emergency measures

Update 9 November: The Commission has now presented its proposal, which is available HERE but despite cosmetic changes, does nothing to address our concerns.

EU plans for an emergency regulation to accelerate renewable energy deployment are highly destructive for biodiversity, undemocratic and possibly illegal, CEE Bankwatch Network and EuroNatur warned today, after a leaked text of the proposal was published by Context Energie [1]. 

The proposal – expected to be formally unveiled by the Commission this week – seeks to use Article 122 of the EU Treaty, which allows the EU to take emergency measures, particularly to overcome energy supply difficulties [2]. However, the draft does not actually entail quick fixes for the energy crisis – setting deadlines for permitting alone does not change the fundamental problems. In addition, the text goes far beyond economic measures with severe and disproportionate effects on key environmental laws. It also duplicates amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive currently being discussed by the European Parliament [3].

The proposal includes an extremely controversial article that would see all renewable energy projects presumed to be of ‘overriding public interest and serving public health and safety’. For example, if it is deemed that there are no suitable alternative solutions, a hydropower project could be built, no matter how much it damages Natura 2000 sites or degrades river water quality. This undermines existing EU environmental legislation which allows such harmful developments only after assessing projects on a case-by-case basis [4]. 

In contradiction with existing legislation, the proposal would also loosen the criteria for killing and significant disturbance of birds to be considered a deliberate act.

Gabriel Schwaderer, Executive Director at EuroNatur, said: ‘What is most frustrating is that this attack on nature will not even make a significant difference to EU renewable generation. Environmental legislation is not the problem but the fundamental safeguard needed – stripping away protection therefore does not solve the problem but simply creates other, or even more problems. This proposal in particular will also add significant legal uncertainty on top of that.’

He added: ‘Rapid development of sustainable renewables is crucial, but the Commission’s thoughtless dismantling of EU environmental legislation is opening Pandora’s box and leading us towards a biodiversity disaster. Today it’s the renewables industry getting special treatment, but which industries will stake their claims tomorrow?’

Pippa Gallop, Southeast Europe Energy Advisor at CEE Bankwatch, said: ‘The Council and Commission’s abuse of Article 122 of the EU Treaty to undermine existing environmental legislation – the Habitats, Birds and Water Framework Directives – without consulting the public or the EU Parliament, will most likely generate lengthy legal challenges and create a public backlash rather than speeding up renewables deployment.’

The Commission needs to drop this plan and concentrate on tackling the real barriers to renewables development, such as unnecessary spatial planning restrictions, low digitalisation of permitting procedures, and a lack of administrative capacity in permitting bodies’, she concluded.

Contacts

Pippa Gallop
Southeast Europe Energy Advisor
CEE Bankwatch Network
pippa.gallop@bankwatch.org
+385 (0)99 755 9787
Skype: pippa.gallop

Christian Stielow
Press and Public Relations Officer
EuroNatur
christian.stielow@euronatur.org
+49 (0)7732 92 72 15

Notes for editors

[1] Key sections of the leaked document are available at: https://twitter.com/AnnaHbrt/status/1589536615915229184

[2] On 20 October the EU Council called on the European Commission and the Council to make urgent proposals to tackle the energy crisis, including ‘fast-tracking of the simplification of permitting procedures in order to accelerate the rollout of renewables and grids including with emergency measures on the basis of Article 122 TFEU’.

[3] On 25 October the Environment Committee of the European Parliament voted on a set of amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive. Civil society organisations’ reactions to the vote can be found here,  here and here. The ITRE Committee is expected to vote on 14 November on a further set of amendments which fall under its remit.

[4] The proposed change regarding ‘overriding public interest and serving public health and safety’ will undermine the protection of Natura 2000 sites in the Habitats Directive (Articles 6(4) and 16(1)(c)), the protection of birds in the Birds Directive (Article 4(7)) and achieving good water status of rivers in the Water Framework Directive (Article 9(1)(a)). 

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube