Kosova e Re lignite power plant, Kosovo
CANCELLED: For more than a decade, successive Kosovo governments planned to build a new 500 MW lignite plant (around 450 MW net), Kosova e Re or New Kosovo. The controversial project was finally cancelled in 2020 after concession-holder ContourGlobal pulled out.
The Kosovo A power plant near Prishtina. Image by Andreas Welch, CC BY-NC-SA
Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
For more than a decade, successive Kosovo governments planned to build a new 500 MW lignite plant (around 450 MW net), Kosova e Re or New Kosovo.
In fact, the plans started out as a planned 2000 MW facility which, it was hoped, would turn the country into a leading energy exporter for the Balkans. Yet, lack of investors, lack of demand, and resistance to a massive lignite project gradually diminished ambitions.
One step forward, two steps back
In December 2017, the Kosovo government signed a series of contracts with UK-registered ContourGlobal for a 20-year concession to build and operate a plant with a net capacity of around 450 MW.
Yet just as the project seemed to be taking a significant step forward, its long-time backer, the World Bank, was getting cold feet. In October 2018, the Bank’s President Kim ended years of speculation by confirming that the Bank had dropped the project because its assessment had shown that it was no longer the least-cost option for Kosovo. Around a month later, the EBRD also confirmed it would not support the project.
ContourGlobal’s CEO then claimed that financing was expected from the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) – now renamed as the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) – and various export credit agencies. However, financing was never approved for the project.
Illegal power purchase agreement and massive costs for consumers and the State
The power purchase contract was almost certainly illegal under the Energy Community Treaty because it would have resulted in the transfer of almost all risks from the investor to the State.
The Energy Community Secretariat had repeatedly warned the Kosovar government about this, but seeing no inclination on the Government’s side to cancel the contract, in May 2019 a group of NGOs filed an official complaint to the Energy Community.
In December 2019 the Secretariat opened a case against Kosovo, stating that certain measures, such as guaranteed energy purchase and availability payments over 20 years, the sale of the plant site below market value, and several other measures constitute State aid. In addition, the measures had not been notified to the competent State aid authority and are therefore automatically illegal.
The Kosovar state obliged itself to buy the plant’s electricity, thus giving itself no incentive to develop renewable options. It also committed to pay an availability fee, just for having the plant in an operational state even when it was not operating.
Sound familiar? This is the same mechanism used for public-private partnership projects in non-profit sectors such as hospitals and schools that has been widely criticised for poor value for money.
Concerns about costs were heightened by the Kosova e Re project only receiving a single bid, which meant there was never any real chance of getting good value for money. The internal rate of return was reduced from 27 percent to 18.5 percent, but this was still very high indeed.
For all these reasons, the Kosovo parliament never ratified the commercial contracts and the project was left hanging for several years.
Illegal environmental impact assessment process
Poor quality environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are unfortunately common in the Balkans, but approving an EIA for a 500 MW coal plant without any public consultation taking place is still quite exceptional.
The news slipped out during a Parliament session in January 2019 and when BIRN Kosovo followed up with the Government, it was confirmed that the environmental impact assessment had been approved in December 2018. Kosovar NGOs therefore initiated a lawsuit against the Government and submitted a complaint to the Energy Community regarding violations of the EU EIA Directive.
An end to the agony
In March 2020, ContourGlobal finally announced its exit from the project. The company stated that would now impossible for the project to meet the required milestones, citing, among other things, the fact that the new government in Kosovo had publicly opposed the contract.
Latest news
Western Balkans: coal pollution increases due to government failures – new report
Press release | 17 September, 2024In 2023, Western Balkan governments’ dereliction of their law enforcement duties again allowed an increase in sulphur dioxide (SO2) pollution from the region’s antiquated coal power plants, according to the sixth edition of Bankwatch’s Comply or Close report, published today (1). Dust and nitrogen oxides (NOx) pollution from coal plants also continued to exceed legal limits.
Read moreNarrow road ahead: the energy crisis in Kosovo in the context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Blog entry | 24 June, 2022Kosovo, almost entirely reliant on coal for its energy, has nevertheless been hard-hit by the ongoing energy crisis. What steps should the country take to address this, and at the same time end its reliance on fossil fuels?
Read moreSerbia: key national plan risks cementing coal dependence
Blog entry | 29 June, 2021The Serbian government’s 15-year national Spatial Plan is so keen to stick to business-as-usual it is openly ignoring some of the country’s most pressing issues to justify plans for six new fossil fuel-based power plants. Belgrade also doesn’t appear to care much about what Serbia’s neighbour to the east thinks regarding the implications these disastrous plans would have for them.
Read moreRelated publications
Why coal is not the way forward – facts versus myths
Briefing | 14 November, 2016 | Download PDFCoal is the single biggest contributor to global climate change. But governments and investors planning new coal capacities have a range of flimsy arguments why coal would be the best or the only alternative. This briefing busts a number of myths surrounding coal, such as “coal is cheap”, “alleviates poverty” or “coal is clean”.
The great coal jobs fraud – unrealistic employment claims in southeast Europe
Study | 14 November, 2016 | Download PDFThis report reveals how and why promises for new jobs in south-east Europe’s coal sector are exaggerated. Hardly any coal operations across the region are economically viable, and as a result many coal workers, especially in the mines, are set to lose their jobs, even if the plans for countless new power plants materialise. Governments, coal workers and their wider communities need to work together towards a just transition.
Western Balkans countries invest at least 2.4 times as much in coal as in wind power
Briefing | 26 May, 2016 | Download PDFAll the Western Balkans countries have committed to increase their share of renewable energy by 2020 to reach between 25 and 40 percent of their energy mix, as part of their obligations under the Energy Community Treaty. Yet this is far from obvious when examining their investment plans for new power generation capacity. Governments are actively planning to build 2800 MW of new coal plants with construction cost of at least EUR 4.5 billion. In contrast, these countries are only planning to build around 1166 MW of wind power plants, at an estimated cost of EUR 1.89 billion.