Kosova e Re lignite power plant, Kosovo
CANCELLED: For more than a decade, successive Kosovo governments planned to build a new 500 MW lignite plant (around 450 MW net), Kosova e Re or New Kosovo. The controversial project was finally cancelled in 2020 after concession-holder ContourGlobal pulled out.
The Kosovo A power plant near Prishtina. Image by Andreas Welch, CC BY-NC-SA
Stay informed
We closely follow international public finance and bring critical updates from the ground.
Background
For more than a decade, successive Kosovo governments planned to build a new 500 MW lignite plant (around 450 MW net), Kosova e Re or New Kosovo.
In fact, the plans started out as a planned 2000 MW facility which, it was hoped, would turn the country into a leading energy exporter for the Balkans. Yet, lack of investors, lack of demand, and resistance to a massive lignite project gradually diminished ambitions.
One step forward, two steps back
In December 2017, the Kosovo government signed a series of contracts with UK-registered ContourGlobal for a 20-year concession to build and operate a plant with a net capacity of around 450 MW.
Yet just as the project seemed to be taking a significant step forward, its long-time backer, the World Bank, was getting cold feet. In October 2018, the Bank’s President Kim ended years of speculation by confirming that the Bank had dropped the project because its assessment had shown that it was no longer the least-cost option for Kosovo. Around a month later, the EBRD also confirmed it would not support the project.
ContourGlobal’s CEO then claimed that financing was expected from the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) – now renamed as the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) – and various export credit agencies. However, financing was never approved for the project.
Illegal power purchase agreement and massive costs for consumers and the State
The power purchase contract was almost certainly illegal under the Energy Community Treaty because it would have resulted in the transfer of almost all risks from the investor to the State.
The Energy Community Secretariat had repeatedly warned the Kosovar government about this, but seeing no inclination on the Government’s side to cancel the contract, in May 2019 a group of NGOs filed an official complaint to the Energy Community.
In December 2019 the Secretariat opened a case against Kosovo, stating that certain measures, such as guaranteed energy purchase and availability payments over 20 years, the sale of the plant site below market value, and several other measures constitute State aid. In addition, the measures had not been notified to the competent State aid authority and are therefore automatically illegal.
The Kosovar state obliged itself to buy the plant’s electricity, thus giving itself no incentive to develop renewable options. It also committed to pay an availability fee, just for having the plant in an operational state even when it was not operating.
Sound familiar? This is the same mechanism used for public-private partnership projects in non-profit sectors such as hospitals and schools that has been widely criticised for poor value for money.
Concerns about costs were heightened by the Kosova e Re project only receiving a single bid, which meant there was never any real chance of getting good value for money. The internal rate of return was reduced from 27 percent to 18.5 percent, but this was still very high indeed.
For all these reasons, the Kosovo parliament never ratified the commercial contracts and the project was left hanging for several years.
Illegal environmental impact assessment process
Poor quality environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are unfortunately common in the Balkans, but approving an EIA for a 500 MW coal plant without any public consultation taking place is still quite exceptional.
The news slipped out during a Parliament session in January 2019 and when BIRN Kosovo followed up with the Government, it was confirmed that the environmental impact assessment had been approved in December 2018. Kosovar NGOs therefore initiated a lawsuit against the Government and submitted a complaint to the Energy Community regarding violations of the EU EIA Directive.
An end to the agony
In March 2020, ContourGlobal finally announced its exit from the project. The company stated that would now impossible for the project to meet the required milestones, citing, among other things, the fact that the new government in Kosovo had publicly opposed the contract.
Latest news
Western Balkans: coal pollution increases due to government failures – new report
Press release | 17 September, 2024In 2023, Western Balkan governments’ dereliction of their law enforcement duties again allowed an increase in sulphur dioxide (SO2) pollution from the region’s antiquated coal power plants, according to the sixth edition of Bankwatch’s Comply or Close report, published today (1). Dust and nitrogen oxides (NOx) pollution from coal plants also continued to exceed legal limits.
Read moreNarrow road ahead: the energy crisis in Kosovo in the context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Blog entry | 24 June, 2022Kosovo, almost entirely reliant on coal for its energy, has nevertheless been hard-hit by the ongoing energy crisis. What steps should the country take to address this, and at the same time end its reliance on fossil fuels?
Read moreSerbia: key national plan risks cementing coal dependence
Blog entry | 29 June, 2021The Serbian government’s 15-year national Spatial Plan is so keen to stick to business-as-usual it is openly ignoring some of the country’s most pressing issues to justify plans for six new fossil fuel-based power plants. Belgrade also doesn’t appear to care much about what Serbia’s neighbour to the east thinks regarding the implications these disastrous plans would have for them.
Read moreRelated publications
Possible coal and energy State aid cases in Energy Community countries based on publicly accessible information
Briefing | 8 June, 2015 | Download PDFBy signing the Energy Community Treaty in 2005, countries in the Western Balkans, Ukraine and Moldova agreed to abide by the European Union’s competition rules. But a number of energy sector investments are being planned that may not so far have taken adequate account of state aid rules. This briefing includes case studies of projects from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, and Ukraine. See related materials including a more detail briefing, a press release and a slideshow at:
Risks for coal and electricity investments in the Western Balkans, Ukraine and Moldova due to state-aid rules
Study | 8 June, 2015 | Download PDFBy signing the Energy Community Treaty in 2005, countries in the Western Balkans, Ukraine and Moldova agreed that the European Union’s competition rules are to be applied also within their territory. A number of energy sector investments are being planned that may not so far have taken adequate account of State aid rules. This briefing therefore provides a summary to draw attention to relevant requirements of EU law and highlight the risks of failure to take them into account when planning investments. The account when planning investments.
Where will all that power go? New study assesses extravagant energy ambitions in the western Balkans
Bankwatch Mail | 14 May, 2015 |Western Balkan countries have ambitious plans to increase their electricity generation over the next years. But what will happen if they all become a regional energy hub? Will there be a demand for all the available electricity?