Greening EU funds

For a climate friendly European Union and the well-being of its people

For the European Union and its Member States to become more sustainable societies, the EU’s financial resources have to be spent towards consuming less energy and using resources more efficiently.

The EU 2020 strategy sets binding targets, yet EU funds are not currently doing enough to reduce greenhouse gases, ensure a more efficient use of energy and natural resources, or protect eco-systems and halt biodiversity loss.

Bankwatch works in three directions to make sure EU funds help achieve these goals:

The EU budget 2014-2020
Cohesion Policy 2014-2020
EU funds implementation at national level

 

The future EU budget


A greener EU Budget to exit the crisis



Read more in our briefing (pdf)

The next long-term budget for the European Union (2014-2020 multi-annual financial framework (MFF)) could help achieve economic and social prosperity in and outside of Europe by building de-carbonised, resource and energy-efficient and socially just economies.

However, the European Commission's budget proposal still allows for too many possibilities for harmful spending.

Bankwatch recommends to shift allocations and spending priorities to sectors of the green economy, in order to

  • help create more jobs;
  • future proof green markets;
  • reach the EU’s 2020 climate and energy objectives;
  • reach the EU’s 2020 biodiversity target.

 

More materials:
Our positions and comments on the ongoing legislative process

 

Sustainable, effective and environmentally focused initiatives are out there. Our Well Spent campaign illustrates how the right spending can bring environmental and economic benefits at the same time

 

The future EU Cohesion Policy


The draft regulations: not ambitious enough

In its Cohesion Policy regulations, the European Commission set out in which way EU funds should be spent in line with the Europe 2020 climate goals and sustainable development objectives.

These regulations fail to earmark sufficient money for green spending which could not only help central and eastern Europe to move towards environmental sustainability but also to modernise their economies and provide a major jobs boost.

In detail:
Cohesion Policy priorities don't aim at 'greening' Europe

 

A Cohesion Policy for Europe's people and environment



Download our study (pdf)

Improving EU regulations

The European Council and the European Parliament can improve the draft regulation, prohibit harmful subsidies and increase earmarking.

Our study Funding Europe’s Future provides practical suggestions for greening EU Cohesion policy by:

  • mapping out areas in which central and eastern European countries need to make investments;
  • details the types of spending which are available from the regional funds;
  • outlines how such moneys need to be prioritised to achieve optimal results.

 

Programming done right



Download
complete recommendations (pdf)
or
sector- and country-specific chapters

Priorities in Member States

Also at national level priorities for how to spend EU funds are being decided now.

Our recommendations for the national Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes, prepared in close cooperation with national NGO coalitions and the support from external experts, offer:

  • concrete measures to be financed,
  • targets to be set,
  • performance indicators to be applied and
  • investment needs to be met ...

... all with a focus on a policy that can foster sustainable development and catalyse the transformation to a low energy-consuming, renewable-based and resource efficient society.

 

EU funds implementation at national level - the need to end harmful spending


With the goal to reduce economic and social disparities between European regions, EU funds specifically flow to central and eastern European countries.

Examples of harmful EU funding



See our map of controversial projects.

In these countries, however, projects are frequently harmful for ecosystems and the climate and often do not increase the quality of people's lives, for instance through:

  • road constructions that negatively affect NATURA 2000 sites;
  • waste management that favours incineration over more efficient recycling solutions.

Therefore, EU funds spending at national level needs to better implement European environmental laws and regulations.

Search EU funds projects by

Saaremaa is the biggest Estonian island (40,000 inhabitants) and an important recreation destination with some 250,000 visitors per year. Famous for its picturesque landscapes, the island's vulnerable ecosystems are in danger of being sacrificed for an expensive bridge construction.

EU Funds
Transport

Expressway developments in north-east Poland could have devastating ramifications on the Knyszyn and Augustow Primeval Forests and the Biebrza Marshes - areas of extraordinary beauty that are home to unique wildelife.

EU Funds
Transport

Poland is hoping to use EU funds to construct municipal waste incinerators in 12 cities – this figure is up from the 9 that were planned in 2008. The total cost of the proposed incinerators will consume around 66% of Poland's Cohesion Funds money for waste management for the 2007-2013 period. Moreover, as potentially only half of the 12 planned incinerators will be ready to apply for EU funding within the present financial period 2007-2013, available waste funding will be blocked for developing alternatives such as separate collection and recycling schemes.

EU Funds
Resource efficiency

Prague motorway's ringroad R1 is a crucial part of the Czech Republic's Trans-European Network (TEN-T). However, some of the road sections being planned for construction are failing to fulfil TEN-T project criteria and their cost-effectiveness is highly questionable.

EU Funds
Transport

Against overwhelming public opposition, Brno hopes to relocate its main train station with the help of EU funding. Reconstructing the current station would be a much more effective use of public money and wouldn't complicate the lives of tens of thousands of people.

EU Funds
Transport

The D8 motorway is part of the Berlin - Prague - Budapest - Sofia - Istanbul European multi-modal transport corridor IV. The controversial history of its construction started fifteen years ago when the Czech government reapproved a motorway scheme that was conceived in 1963.

EU Funds
Transport