• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Bankwatch

  • About us
    • Our vision
    • Who we are
    • 30 years of Bankwatch
    • Donors & finances
    • Get involved
  • What we do
    • Campaign areas
      • Beyond fossil fuels
      • Rights, democracy and development
      • Finance and biodiversity
      • Funding the energy transformation
      • Cities for People
    • Institutions we monitor
      • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
      • European Investment Bank
      • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
      • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
      • EU funds
    • Our projects
    • Success stories
  • Publications
  • News
    • Blog posts
    • Press releases
    • Stories
    • Podcast
    • Us in the media
    • Videos
  • Donate

Home > Archives for Blog entry

Blog entry

Bursting bubbles: greens and geeks of the world, unite!

This is relevant to our campaign against destructive hydropower in the Balkans where the lack of baseline data about potential dam sites is chronic and can jeopardise immense local biodiversity. It is also relevant to our efforts in moving the Balkan region beyond coal, where public authorities intentionally fiddle with data on air pollution.

Last week we participated in DesCon 2018, a collaborative hi-tech event on the so called Internet of Things (IoT) that this year was focused on global warming and pollution monitoring.

A winning idea

The illustration used in the presentation: Hydropower in the Context of Sustainable Energy Supply: A Review of Technologies and Challenges – Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. CC BY 3.0

Our idea to monitor environmental flows of small hydropower plants was voted second at the competition organised as a part of the conference, in which five other software or hardware tools entered. The proposed device should provide continuous monitoring of the quantity of water discharged from small dams, a crucial element in preserving ecosystems downstream.

The international team developed the first blueprints of the monitoring device. One team participant, Jari Arkko, was attracted to the idea as he is an avid cave researcher, where water flow measurements are also very relevant. The team has developed a series of scripts to grab publicly available data on electricity production from official sources and use it to calculate water intake by hydropower plants. This will serve as a control variable to monitor the actual discharge from the dams.

Screenshot of the output of the script

The challenge was to scrape the data on electricity production from governmental databases. Open data formats are a rarity in the Balkan countries, the information is scarce and spread around obscure PDF files. And that is if you are lucky enough to find it online. Most of the times information is available only upon request, and yet again not in the machine-readable form. This is hampering citizen’s access to information, a staple of any meaningful civic participation, including involvement in developing a sustainable renewables sector sensitive to water scarcity due to climate change impacts.

Why monitoring matters?

The idea to create such a monitoring device was inspired by Bankwatch’s independent air pollution monitoring campaign carried out in the last two years in the Balkan region.  On DesCon Ioana presented some of the highlights of this work.

Our air pollution monitoring offered the first ever observations regarding a pattern of daytime/ nighttime emissions in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina, indicative of potential switching off of pollution controllers at the local coal power plant. It also produced some jaw-dropping findings in the village of Rosia de Jiu, Romania, where dust particles originating from coal facilities have been up to 30 times the EU limit.

Independent monitoring of air pollution throughout the region has been instrumental in providing local communities, exposed to such alarming levels of pollution, the evidence that official monitoring stations are failing to collect. In most Balkan countries, the national system of monitoring is insufficiently spread, the data is not collected continuously, nor displayed in real time and most of the coal-polluted hotspots are not even being monitored.

It was, therefore, no surprise that the first prize of the DesCon 2018 contest went to a team who built a PM2.5 sensor, which is cheap to produce and easy to carry and map the air quality in certain locations.

Such devices should not absolve the environmental authorities of performing official measurements, but they can be pivotal in determining the sources of pollution in a certain location which makes it then easier to propose remedial measures adapted to the local context.

Climate change and environmental destruction are not easy challenges. They require unconventional approaches and innovative solutions. Ioana and Igor burst the NGO bubble by joining the DesCon crew, and discussing environmental issues with a diverse community. And had a lot of fun. Some  hacking is indeed going to be needed to change the status quo. “One hack at the time” as the motto of the DesCon conference goes.

EBRD – still fixated on gas despite IPCC warnings

According to the new draft strategy, the EBRD expects to finance “different types of gas infrastructure – for example, upstream, midstream, interconnectors, transmission and distribution networks, underground storage, LNG terminals, floating storage and regasification units – that improve interconnectivity, create well-functioning markets, provide flexibility to energy systems and enable fuel switching from coal and heavy fuels.”

While the EBRD does impose some criteria on its future gas lending, the impact of this screening is unsure. In the past, the bank’s way of calculating emissions has allowed the institution to finance the Southern Gas Corridor and claim that it would have a positive impact on combatting climate change.

In the era of the Paris Agreement, it is unacceptable that financing institutions are still supporting the construction of any new fossil fuel infrastructure at all. If the goal of limiting climate change to 1.5°C is to be achieved, no more fossil fuel electricity generation facilities can be built at all since 2017, according to a 2016 Oxford University study.

In addition, Oil Change International has shown that not only can no new fossil fuel power stations be built, but no new fossil fuel infrastructure at all. This is because the potential carbon emissions from the oil, gas, and coal in the world’s currently operating fields and mines would already take us beyond 2°C of warming, and even excluding coal, the reserves in currently operating oil and gas fields would take us beyond 1.5°C.

A new Bankwatch analysis of the EBRD’s EUR 6.35 billion in support for energy-related projects between 2014-2017 shows that 41 percent of the financing supported fossil fuels, while 27 percent supported renewable energy, excluding large hydropower plants.

Between 2014 and 2017, the proportion of investments dedicated to fossil fuels declined compared to 48 percent from 2006-2011, but absolute fossil fuel lending has been on a rising trend since at least 2010, peaking in 2016 at EUR 774 million.

Most of the fossil fuel investments are supporting oil and gas extraction and transportation. In 2017 almost two thirds of fossil fuel investments were made up by just one project – the TANAP section of the Southern Gas Corridor, which received no less than EUR 417 million, out of a fossil fuel total of EUR 674 million.

But the good news is that in 2017, the bank’s renewable investments finally matched its fossil fuel investments. Our analysis shows that the EBRD is generally able to increase its business in renewable energy and add value to the green energy transition.

In this context, the new draft energy strategy of the EBRD is both disappointing and worrying, in that it indicates that the bank is not willing to do as much as it potentially could for the energy transition. The EBRD plans to give a disproportionately large role to gas investments – despite warnings from scientists that such investments are not compatible with a 1.5°C scenario. And it fails to concentrate as much as it could on renewables and energy savings.

Despite the fact that the EBRD’s own draft Strategy admits that, in the best case, gas can only bring a 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas intensity for power generation compared to coal, the Strategy vastly over-emphasises its role in the energy transition. The new IPCC report says there has to be 74 percent less primary energy from gas in 2050 relative to 2010 unless carbon capture and storage becomes viable. This means the electricity generation share of gas has to decrease to approximately 8 percent of global electricity in 2050. If there is to be such a large reduction it seems highly inappropriate to put such hopes in its role in the EBRD countries of operation.

Open letter to ministers regarding the EU Budget

Dear Minister,

The co-signatories of this letter represent a broad group of businesses, civil society, local authorities, think tanks and other organisations who are working together to support the EU’s commitment to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement objectives. We are writing to urge you to ensure that the next MFF is aligned with Europe’s climate and energy objectives, and is consistent with and contributes to the Paris Climate Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals across all programmes.

The recently published IPCC 1.5°C report shows that we have the scientific understanding, the technological capacity and the money to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The only barrier is one of political will, which you and your colleagues can change.  

Therefore, we ask you to:

  • Increase the climate action target to at least 40% of the whole EU Budget, with specific ex-ante binding targets per programme.
  • Climate proof the entire EU budget, and exclude spending on projects that are not in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, such as unabated fossil fuels infrastructure and environmentally harmful subsidies. Extend the exclusion criteria on fossil fuels in the Cohesion Fund programme proposal to all fossil fuel investment and apply these across all programmes.
  • Include Energy Efficiency First as a mandatory assessment tool in all planning and preparation of programmes and projects, similar to the provisions in the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union.
  • Improve the performance and result orientation of climate action. Take into account the recommendations by the European Court of Auditors on the climate tracking methodology, differentiate between mitigation and adaptation measures, and avoid overestimation.
  • Align financial flows and fiscal incentives to a low carbon pathway as committed to under the Paris Climate Agreement. Align the National Energy and Climate Plans with financing strategies under the EU Budget, and incentivise climate action through higher budget allocation and better financial conditions.
  • Provide support for a low carbon transition in high-carbon regions.

We look forward to engaging with you on this very important matter.

Yours sincerely,

ACT Alliance

AE3R – Ploiesti-Prahova Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Agency

Akcja Konin

Alofa Tuvalu

Amis de la Terre France

AVERE – The European Association for Electromobility

Buildings for the Future

Carbon Market Watch

CEE Bankwatch

CEPA Priatelia Zeme

CEPTA – Center for Sustainable Alternatives

CFEE – Coalition France pour l’Efficacité Energétique

Chance for Buildings

CITENERGO

Citizens Climate Lobby

CLER – Réseau pour la transition énergétique

Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-E)

Climate Alliance

Climate Reality Project

CNCD 11.11.11

CLG – The Prince of Wales’s Corporate Leaders Group

Counterbalance

Covenant of Mayors National Platform Slovakia

Czech Green Building Council

Deneff – Deutsche Unternehmensinitiative EnergieEffizienz

Deutsche Umwelthilfe

Divadlo Astorka Korzo ’90

DNR – Deutscher Naturschutzring

Eco-union

EHPA – European Heat Pump Assocation

Ekoenergy

Energy Cities

EPS – Sdružení EPS ČR/Czech EPS association

EU-ASE – European Alliance to Save Energy

EUREC – The Association of European Renewable Energy Research Centres

Euro Perspectives Foundation

ETUC – European Trade Union Confederation

EuroACE

E3G

Fedarene

FERN

Focus – Focus, društvo za sonaraven razvoj / Focus Association for Sustainable Development

Food and Water Europe

FÖS – Forum Ökologisch-Soziale Marktwirtschaft e.V.

Friends of the Earth Europe

Fundacja Greenmind

Fundacja Miasto Prowincjonalne

Fundacja Nasza Ziemia

Fundacja Zielone Światło

Hnutí DUHA – Friends of the Earth Czech Republic

Fundación Renovables

Fundacja Fundusz Partnerstwa – Partnership Fund

Fundacja Instytut Rozwoju Innowacyjnej Energetyki

Fundacja Otwarty Plan

Fundacja Rozwój Tak – Odkrywki Nie!

Green Budget Europe

Green Building Council Espana

Green Building Council Italia

Green Liberty Latvia

IEW – Fédération Inter-Environnement Wallonie

Islamic Relief Worldwide

Legambiente

InspirAction

Irish Green Building Council

Katedra Ecologie

Magyar Természetvédök Szövetzége – Friends of the Earth Hungary

Milieudefensie

Mouvement Ecologique

Municipality of Ciechanów

Municipality Ostrów Wielkopolski

National Society of Conservationists – Friends of the Earth Hungar

Ögni – Osterreichische Gesellschaft für Nachhaltige Immobilienwirtschaft

Ogólnopolskie Stowarzyszenie Budownictwa Naturalnego

Oil Change International Oil Change International

Państwomiasto Fundacja Projekt: Polska

Polski Klub Ekologiczny Okręg Mazowiecki (Polish Ecological Club Mazovian Branch)

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Budownictwa Ekologicznego | Polish Green Building Council (PLGBC)

Polska Zielona Sieć

Push Sweden

RAC France

REFEDD – REseau Français des Etudiants pour le Développement Durable

ROENEF – The Association for Promoting Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Seas at Risk

Slovak Academy of Sciences – Institute of Forecasting

Slovak Association of Photovoltaic Industry and RES (SAPI)

Society for Sustainable Living

Stowarzyszenie do spraw Rozliczania Energii

Stowarzyszenie Ab Ovo

Stowarzyszenie BoMiasto

Stowarzyszenie Eko Unia

Stowarzyszenie Zielony Imielin

Towarzystwo dla Natury i Człowieka

Towarzystwo na rzecz Ziemi

Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Rzek Iny i Gowienicy

Transport & Environment

Więcej niż Energia

ZERO – Associação Sistema Terrestre Sustentável

Zero Waste Europe

The complaints mechanism at the EIB – usable but useless?

If the policy proposed by the bank’s management is adopted by its board on Tuesday (October 9), the complaints mechanism will lose its teeth, becoming all but useless in  practice for ensuring accountability and redress.

Established a decade ago, the complaints mechanism is one of the youngest grievance bodies among its peers, although the bank is one of the oldest multilateral financial institutions. The EU’s house bank has for several years been averse to public scrutiny or evaluation, and the draft policy makes structurally and procedurally weaker the mechanism.

The new policy introduces an unprecedented level of control over the mechanism’s reports by the bank’s service and management committee. It allows for the bank’s inspector general to ask for a revision of the complaint mechanism’s final conclusions, even in cases where a member of the bank’s management or staff voices disagreement.  The complainant will not even see the report until all issues are settled within the bank.

Such a policy is only likely to deter potential complainants from accessing the bank’s grievance body if they have no confidence that it is able to genuinely address their problems and concerns.

The EIB’s own legitimacy as an EU public institution is on the line. The bank’s board has a statutory responsibility to oversee its management and instruct that amendments are made to bank policies, procedures and operations when needed. The Board also gives complaint mechanism its mandate.

Under the proposed policy, the EIB’s board is not supposed to know about the work of mechanism, nor it is allowed, unlike other EIB bodies, to initiate investigations by the mechanism. The mechanism also would not have its budget approved by the board nor its reports published under the board’s authority, which would strengthen the legitimacy of its work. This is in contrast to policy provisions guiding the bank’s operations evaluations division, a sister accountability mechanism placed next to the mechanism in the bank’s inspectorate general.

The review of the mechanism appears to move it away from its mandate of addressing instances of wrongdoings and maladministration. Rather than reasserting the bank’s commitment to the public interest, the new policy is seeking to shrink the bank’s accountability even further and reduce the mechanism to mere lip service.

In theory this review should be an opportunity to learn from other accountability bodies. But a joint submission by Bankwatch and other civil society groups finds that of 55 best practices to strengthen the bank’s accountability and ensure that remedy is provided to complainants, the current mechanism meets only nine of these recommendations in full.

The bank’s current mechanism meets only nine of these recommendations in full. With the policy review process set to water down these provisions even further, the independence and legitimacy of this important mechanism must not be compromised.

European public banks continue financing coal bonanza

First published in Euractiv.

After the signing of the Paris Agreement on tackling climate change, international public financing for coal-based electricity has become indefensible. And yet, major European public banks, including the European Investment Bank (EIB) and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), have found a way to continue supporting the biggest polluters.

Every year, billions of euros are being transferred to fossil fuels-based energy corporations, thus effectively helping them sustain outdated energy systems against the economic and environmental interests of their customers.

A recent Bankwatch analysis showed that since 2013 the EIB has provided €3.9 billion to a number of coal-based energy companies, despite them having no plans to decarbonise. Similarly, the EBRD has extended unconditional loans to utilities which continue to develop new coal power capacities.

In Serbia, for example, EBRD investments in the national power utility Elektroprivreda, a company which dominates lignite mining and generates almost all of the country’s electricity, were supposed to bring environmental improvements.

In reality, however, the company’s energy-related greenhouse gas emissions have increased in recent years despite EBRD and EIB loans. And it keeps opening new mines to fuel its polluting coal power plants.

Both banks also regularly support Polish state energy companies such as Energa, PGE and Enea. Billions of euros intended to help the companies expand electricity grids, have in practice freed up cash for new coal power plants and other dirty investments.

In 2016, Energa and Enea decided on a joint investment in new, 1,000 MW coal capacities. A tender for the construction of the Ostrołęka coal-fired power plant has already been completed.

In 2017, after Energa received EIB and EBRD loans for issuing of hybrid bonds for grid development, the company cancelled old contracts with renewable energy producers. Earlier in 2016, Energa and PGE invested €115 million each in the newly established Polish Mining Group, now the EU’s biggest hard-coal miner.

PGE, Poland’s largest coal-heavy utility, is also one of the biggest polluters in Europe. Its Belchatow power plant alone emits as much mercury into the air as Spain’s entire industrial sector.

But make no mistake – the company has no plan to comply with the Paris Agreement. Its capital expenditures in renewable energy decreased by 44% in 2017 compared to the year before, and it is currently developing new coal capacities and modernizing its existing, old coal fleet.

Some of the EBRD and EIB loans for grid expansion were supposed to facilitate renewables connectivity but this is only part of the picture. A small part indeed. Our analysis has found that out of a total of €1.5 billion the EIB has extended to Polish electricity utilities between 2013-2017, less than 1% was spent on renewable capacity or grid enhancement for renewable energy.

This is all the more surprising since the companies have been recently struggling with the increase of carbon price which is still expected to rise. Their customers will eventually bear the cost.

These cases illustrate that Europe’s public banks must apply stricter due diligence in the interest of the environment and society. No loans should be granted to companies which intend to develop new coal-based heat and power capacities and which do not develop decarbonisation plans aligned with the Paris Agreement.

More efforts from the EBRD required to mainstream gender in Kyrgyzstan

Originally published on the Foreign Policy Centre

The European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has invested more than EUR 650 million in support of the Kyrgyz Republic since the Central Asian country gained its independence following collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

One of the core objectives of the EBRD in the Kyrgyz Republic is to address inclusion gaps in relation to gender equality.

EBRD projects in southern Kyrgyzstan

In line with its goals, the EBRD has provided a loan of EUR 5.7 million and a grant of EUR 3.1 million to implement the modernisation of bus and trolleybus fleets, the introduction of an e-ticket system, staff training and improvement of technical equipment in the country’s second largest city of Osh. In addition to the public transport project, the EBRD has also provided more than EUR 10 million to rehabilitate wastewater and drinking water supply infrastructure in Osh.

In 2016, the government of Switzerland and EBRD collectively provided funding for a new wastewater plant in the city of Osh. The EBRD extended a EUR 3 million sovereign loan and Switzerland a EUR 5.05 million grant for the project, undertaken by the Osh Water Company, a municipal water and wastewater operator. The works included an upgrade of existing facilities as well as the installation of brand new equipment.

Screenshot from “5News” report on the drinking water quality in Osh city, 2017

Researchers, including this author, travelled to Osh to conduct a survey on the impact of these projects on gender equality in the city’s public transportation and water sectors in the month of October 2017. The EBRD’s investments in Osh city were largely welcomed and supported by residents who participated in the field survey. The research survey focused on acquiring data based on age, gender and occupation in the public transportation and water sectors. Whilst the gender-mainstreaming study objective was focused on gender inclusion, the survey has revealed the problems with accessibility for disabled residents and recurrent issues regarding school children’s safety in private transportation.

The survey underlines common use of public transportation and municipal water supply. Therefore, it is primarily focused on the EBRD funded projects to improve public services in Osh city. However, the poll results for the private transportation sector outline a whole set of separate challenges in contrast to the city’s public transportation.

In context with the methodology of the research, additional questions have been prepared for the Osh city Mayor’s Office and municipal services. However, the city officials declined to be interviewed citing procedural requirements for the meeting with researchers on initial visit to the Mayor’s administration. In the days and weeks after the first visit, the city administration officials failed to respond in a timely manner or demonstrate their willingness to provide information for this survey during research mission in October 2017.

Nonetheless, researchers established that the EBRD’s objective to ‘improve human resource policies and practices both from equal opportunities and commercially focused perspectives’  had yet to be fully implemented for both project aims  to include a gender inclusion component.

Indeed, in a response letter to this study, the EBRD acknowledged the challenges of gender mainstreaming in the Osh city municipality. ‘The Gender Advisory Services Programme for the Osh Auto Public Transport Company started in 2015 and is scheduled to finish in mid-2018. The total cost of the assignment is EUR 179,928. The Programme was developed by the bank after pre-investment due diligence revealed that only 20 of the Company’s 236 workforce were women and only one of their 164 drivers was female. The due diligence revealed that the high staff turnover is one of the big challenges – for example, in 2015 they have reported a loss of 50% of their drivers.’ according to the EBRD.

The research findings in Osh are consistent with the conclusions of the paper ‘Gender Equality Initiatives in Transportation Policy’ authored by Yael Hasson and Marianna Polevoy who found that ‘The travel patterns of women differ from those of men. These differences are linked to gender inequality within the home and the labor market, urban structures, and the processes of socialisation and education. Women and men make different use of a shared system of transportation’.

Gender Inclusion Challenges

According to the bank’s announcement the ‘EBRD-supported gender advisory services programme will see the city’s authorities and the Osh Auto Transport Company work together to offer improved job and career growth opportunities to women in the company’.

EBRD funded public transport project in Osh city, 2017

However, the Osh city development plan 2016-2020 does not stipulate career opportunities for women in the public transportation and water sectors or include objectives for the municipal services in the same period.  It does include a chapter which underlines priority for the gender policy and support of women. In the expected outcome, the development roadmap implies more job opportunities will be created for women and youth in Osh, which seemingly has declarative intent rather than a realistic plan based on an agreement.

Furthermore, the Mayor’s Office pledge, in the development roadmap for greater transparency and open access to public and civil society organisations falls short of actual delivery of policy. The affirmed goal of close cooperation with public and civil society regarding evaluation and monitoring of the city development programs raises questions regarding lack of communication in the Mayor’s Office.

The city development plan has a detailed description of expenditure for the public transportation sector which includes modernisation of the bus and trolleybus fleet, introduction of an e-ticket system, staff training and improvement of the technical equipment, but a  gender component of the EBRD funded project is not included in the city’s expenditure plans.  In a similar fashion, the city’s plans for the Water Company doesn’t include expenditure for an inclusive  gender policy.

Previously, the media coverage of the Mayor’s Office roadmap 2016-2020 highlighted deficiencies in the city development plan. The RFE/RL Kyrgyz language service (Azattyk) report stressed the city administration’s immediate focus on infrastructure projects and the lack of human development programs in the plan itself. It is unclear how the city authorities conduct or implement their original development target goals with respect to gender-mainstreaming.

It is even less clear whether a commitment on gender equality is part of the city administration’s long-term planning for the public transportation and water sectors, despite the official narratives.

The research team was unable to verify or observe the EBRD’s ‘work-in-progress’ in the Osh municipal services regarding gender inclusion, due to the city administration’s failure to collaborate with observers on the ground.

Recommendations

Throughout the month-long research, the team has discovered acute concerns and problems regarding functionality of the public and private transportation and water services. Just as in the country’s capital Bishkek, the city of Osh may require expansion of the public transportation routes within city limits in addition to existing geographical coverage.

Among critical concerns which were raised by the survey participants: the discrimination and harassment of pupils in the private transportation sector; unsafe rides on private minibuses underscored by both gender groups; lack of capacity of the existing transportation system due to traffic congestion and the insufficient number of public transportation units; a report of sexual harassment in one specific case; untrained staff in both, public and private transportation; disparity of communication between the authorities and city residents; and an unsatisfactory level of service for the disabled residents in public and private transportation.

Respectively, the Water Municipal Company will require enhancement of the communication policy with city residents which seems inadequate at its present level, more efforts to maintain an uninterrupted supply of water throughout the year, improvement of the quality of drinking water during rainy seasons, cooperation with local civil society organisations and activist groups on the promotion of water conservation practices in the city.

The gender-mainstreaming study objective of the research mission couldn’t be fully achieved as a result of the Osh city administration’s failure to communicate with the team after the Presidential election. It appears the EBRD funds are prioritised on the first-need service basis rather than the long-term strategy goals identified by the EBRD in both the public transportation and water sectors.

It is recommended that the EBRD conducts further consultation with clients on bringing focus back to the gender component in the decision-making process in the local administration and municipal companies; facilitates open access for civil society organisations to the information on gender equality in the municipal companies of Osh city; take steps to undertake annual research and analysis in the public transportation and water sectors based on gender component; improve the city administration’s communication strategy with the public and civil society organisations;  include the perspectives of women and youth in the decision-making process;  integrate more women in planning and implementation of development plans for the municipal services; and  introduce annual target goal parameters for gender equality in the public transportation and water sectors.

This essay is a summary of a report produced for Bankwatch:

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

CEE Bankwatch Network gratefully acknowledges EU funding support.

The content of this website is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 License

Your personal data collected on the website is governed by the present Privacy Policy.

Get in touch with us

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • YouTube